Skip to content Skip to footer

67 Republicans Join Democrats on Vote to Remove Confederate Statues From Capitol

The measure passed 285 to 120, with all 120 no votes coming from Republican representatives.

A statue of Robert E. Lee, commander of the Confederate States Army during the Civil War, is on display in the Crypt of the U.S. Capitol on June 18, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

The House voted on Tuesday to remove all statues of Confederate leaders on display in the Capitol as well as a bust of a former Supreme Court chief justice who in 1957 wrote the Dred Scott decision, regarded as one of the most loathsome racist court decisions in U.S. history.

The measure passed 285 to 120, with all Democrats and 67 Republicans supporting the resolution. All 120 no votes were from Republicans. The bill now goes to the Senate, where it will likely face opposition from Republicans there.

The House has passed similar legislation before, in 2020, when the bill passed by a slightly larger margin — 305 to 113. But Republicans blocked it from being considered in the Senate and Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), the majority leader at the time, refused to bring it to a vote.

“Symbols of racism and hatred have no place in our country and should certainly not be enshrined in the U.S. Capitol,” said Rep. Barbara Lee (D-California), one of the legislators who reintroduced the resolution, in a statement in May. “The Dred Scott decision is a moral stain on our nation. Removing these statues is a long overdue step in addressing America’s painful legacy of racism.”

The passage of the bill comes as the nation is facing a reckoning over racism and the U.S.’s racist history. Activists have been advocating for tearing down Confederate monuments and other symbols of oppression for years, but the movement picked up steam last year during the resurgence of the movement for Black lives.

A report from earlier this year found that 168 Confederate symbols were removed in 2020, either forcefully by demonstrators or voluntarily by local government officials.

Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) had originally proposed removing the Confederate statues in the Capitol last summer as demonstrators across the country were participating in protests after the police murder of George Floyd.

It’s unclear whether Hoyer’s resolution will pass this time. If McConnell unites his party in opposition to the bill, Democrats will have trouble finding 10 Republican votes to help them pass the filibuster. But it’s unclear if McConnell will oppose the effort, and it’s unclear if his party would unite against it.

Earlier this month, the Senate passed legislation making Juneteenth a national holiday, with only 14 House Republicans voting against it.

It was a somewhat surprising move for Republicans to recognize a holiday that celebrates emancipation, considering that they are currently waging a war on the history of Juneteenth itself in schools across the country. Many abolitionists and advocates for Black lives, however, argued that making Juneteenth a holiday is largely symbolic and possibly harmful in the face of the realities of police violence and oppression that Black Americans face daily.

Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-South Carolina), one of the lawmakers who reintroduced this session’s resolution to remove the Confederate statues, pointed to the violence and racism inherent in the Donald Trump-fueled attack on the Capitol on January 6 as a reason for Congress to vote to remove the statues.

“On January 6th, we experienced the divisiveness of Confederate battle flags being flown inside the U.S. Capitol. Yet there are still vestiges that remain in this sacred building that glorify people and a movement that embraced that flag and sought to divide and destroy our great country,” Clyburn said in a statement. “This legislation will remove these commemorations from places of honor and demonstrate that as Americans we do not celebrate those who seek to divide us.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 98 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy