Dozens of UN experts are warning weapons makers, governments and investors that they are risking being complicit in “serious violations” of international human rights laws, potentially including genocide, by providing weapons to Israel as it wages genocide in Gaza.
The group of 30 human rights experts, including multiple special rapporteurs to the UN, called out arms manufacturers like U.S. companies Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and more, saying that they should end transfers “even if they are executed under existing export licenses.”
“These companies, by sending weapons, parts, components, and ammunition to Israeli forces, risk being complicit in serious violations of international human rights and international humanitarian laws,” the experts said in a statement.
The recent order by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) demanding that Israel immediately stop its Rafah invasion, as well as the ICJ’s finding that it is “plausible” that Israel is committing genocide, have heightened that risk, the experts warned. The group contains experts on a wide range of human rights, and includes Special Rapporteur on Palestine Francesca Albanese.
“In this context, continuing arms transfers to Israel may be seen as knowingly providing assistance for operations that contravene international human rights and international humanitarian laws and may result in profit from such assistance,” they said.
The UN experts also warn investors in these manufacturers, like Bank of America, BlackRock, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, State Farm, Wells Fargo and others, that they could also be liable for aiding human rights abuses against Palestinians. While these financiers may not be directly making the weapons Israel is using in its campaign of extermination, they are making it possible for nations and arms companies to do so.
“Arms initiate, sustain, exacerbate, and prolong armed conflicts, as well as other forms of oppression, hence the availability of arms is an essential precondition for the commission of war crimes and violations of human rights, including by private armament companies,” the group said.
Advocates for Palestinian rights have long targeted arms manufacturers for not just creating the weapons used to slaughter Palestinians, but also profiting from the genocide; the more brutal and prolonged the destruction, the more money the companies and their executives rake in, as arms companies openly tell their investors.
General Dynamics makes the MK-80 series of bombs that Israel has long used in its decades-old campaign against Palestinians; Boeing creates the bomb kits that help Israel level refugee camps and residential buildings; General Dynamics developed and Lockheed Martin makes the F-16 fighter jets bombs are dropped from.
The experts also called out companies with lesser-known ties to Israel’s slaughter, like Caterpillar, which has made the bulldozers that Israel has used to destroy buildings and cemeteries.
Activists have targeted particularly prolific arms makers and investors with divestment campaigns, while the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement has seen a surge in activity since October.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.