Echoing arguments similar to those used by the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court striking down affirmative action, Republican attorneys general from 23 states petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency this week to stop taking race into account when regulating pollution.
The petition, authored by the office of Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, was filed Tuesday with the EPA. It is only a request, but it highlights stiff opposition from conservative states to the Biden administration’s signature environmental justice policies, which include hundreds of millions of dollars for environmental justice projects.
The push could lead to a change in EPA policy if Donald Trump — whose administration was poised to gut the civil-rights law in the final days of his presidency — retakes power in January.
In the United States, deadly pollution is disproportionately concentrated in poor and minority neighborhoods. The petition asks the agency to stop taking the “disparate impact” of this pollution into account when regulating it, altering how the agency enforces Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Title VI bars recipients of federal funds from engaging in discrimination. After the act was passed, the EPA wrote rules that allowed it to take into account the “disparate impact” that pollution might have on a minority group. Those rules were rarely enforced before Biden took office.
Andre Segura, vice president of litigation at Earthjustice, called the petition “outrageous” and called on the EPA to “swifty reject” it.
“The fact is, many of the states that have signed the petition have historically allowed these harmful facilities to be placed in predominantly Black and brown communities, without regard for the health and safety of residents,” Segura said. “These decades-old Title VI regulations are critical tools for the federal government to use to ensure that funding is not used to perpetuate this toxic legacy.”
The petition claims that the law requires states to “engage in racial engineering.”
“The EPA’s regulations gravely depart from the original understanding of Title VI and compel States to unconstitutionally discriminate against their citizens by incorporating disparate-impact liability,” the petitioners wrote.
Citing pending litigation, the EPA declined to comment.
But EPA Administrator Michael Regan told attendees of the Society of Environmental Journalists national conference on April 5 that the agency would push to ensure that the civil-rights law can be applied in environmental cases.
“We’ll continue to evaluate what tools we have in that Title VI space,” Regan said. “We are remaining vigilant and as creative as possible in terms of using our statutory and legal authority to protect every person in this country.”
The petition has its roots in an aborted 2022 attempt by the EPA to investigate how the state of Louisiana enforced its pollution regulations.
After uncovering information that regulators in that state had not done enough to inform the public about the risk of cancer-causing chemicals coming from the Denka chloroprene plant in LaPlace, the EPA sued the plant.
But then the state of Louisiana sued the EPA — and won.
The Denka plant is the only U.S. facility that produces chloroprene, a key component of wetsuits. It is located in a majority-Black ZIP code in southern Louisiana that is part of the industry-heavy region dubbed “Cancer Alley.”
“To be sure, if a decision maker has to consider race to decide, it has indeed participated in racism,” U.S. District Judge James Cain wrote in his Jan. 24 decision. “Pollution does not discriminate.”
Cain’s ruling barred the EPA from doing any Title VI enforcement in environmental cases in the state.
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, a Republican, is not one of the 23 signatories to the petition. “We have our own thing going on,” press secretary Lester Duhe said. “We can’t join every party.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy