A coalition of government watchdog and advocacy groups sent a letter to Democratic leaders on Tuesday, urging them to take action to ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks, a move the organizations say is crucial to protecting democracy and preserving Congress’s legitimacy.
The group of 22 organizations told Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) in their letter that the Democrats must bring a stock ban to a vote before the November elections usher in a new Congress, and that the leaders must throw their support behind a ban in order to ensure its success.
“We are at a critical juncture in our nation’s history. The steady stream of revelations that members of Congress have repeatedly flouted basic financial conflict of interest laws,” the groups wrote. “We urge you to lead the way in passing these common sense, popular policies to ensure that members of Congress act in the interest of the people they serve, rather than their own financial interest.”
The letter was signed by watchdog groups like the Campaign Legal Center, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), Project on Government Oversight and Public Citizen. Advocacy groups like End Citizens United and Greenpeace USA also signed on.
The groups asked Pelosi and Schumer to commit to bringing a stock ban to a vote in early September. Lawmakers have introduced several versions of a congressional stock ban over the past months, and the groups say that a strong and effective ban would include three key components: it would prohibit lawmakers from trading individual stocks, include their spouses and dependent children in the ban, and create a clear enforcement mechanism that will actually compel lawmakers to comply.
“[W]e fear that without your strong leadership and advocacy this critical good government reform will stall,” the letter reads. “The August recess and the November elections loom. Each day that passes increases the chance that Congress will not have time to take up and pass this legislation. That must not happen.”
Until lawmakers pass a stock ban, the coalition warns, there will always be issues with public confidence in Congress. As long as members are regularly found to be in violation of the STOCK Act — which places weak financial reporting requirements on lawmakers — the public will always have a certain degree of mistrust in the motivations of lawmakers, who are often regulating the very companies that they own a stake in.
Indeed, as Gallup found last month, public confidence in Congress is at an all-time low at only 7 percent, down five points from 2021. Meanwhile, proposals to ban members of Congress from trading stocks consistently poll well with the public; in June, Data for Progress found that 70 percent of likely voters support congressional stock bans, while 68 percent agreed that members’ spouses should also be barred from the practice.
Several stock scandals have rocked Congress in recent years, including insider trading accusations against senators from both sides of the aisle who made expedient stock trades after senators had had a confidential briefing about the looming coronavirus pandemic, before the public knew about the effect the pandemic would have on the economy.
The Department of Justice later dropped the insider trading investigations, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) still hasn’t concluded its investigation into Sen. Richard Burr’s (R-North Carolina) trades. But the seemingly suspicious trades have had a negative impact on the public’s views of Congress, and may even have contributed to Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Georgia) losing her seat in the 2020 election.
The idea of a stock ban has rare bipartisan support in Congress, with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), Senators Jon Ossoff (D-Georgia) and Mark Kelly (D-Arizona) and even far right Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Montana) introducing separate bills that propose different versions of a stock ban.
House Democrats are in the process of drafting a consensus bill to ban members from trading individual stocks that is slated to be released soon. Lawmakers in the Senate are also working on a bill combining several different proposals, though it’s unclear if or when leaders will schedule a vote on the measure.
Though there is broad support for such legislation, one key figure has waffled on her support of the bill: Lawmakers have theorized that Pelosi, whose husband is a prolific stock trader, does not want to bring the bill to a vote, since she herself benefits greatly from the lax rules around the practice.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $100,000 in one-time donations and to add 1300 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy