Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan, the GOP’s choice to become the next Speaker of the House, failed to win the position during the first round of voting on Tuesday.
Jordan received 200 votes, all from Republicans, in support of him becoming the next Speaker. New York Democratic Rep. Hakeem Jeffries attained 212 votes, also all from his own party, but isn’t expected to be a contender for the speakership as Republicans hold a majority in the House.
Twenty Republicans didn’t vote for Jordan, a somewhat expected outcome in the first round of voting, as many in the conference opposed his selection as the speaker-designate, due in part to his extremist right-wing positions and his strong loyalty to Donald Trump.
Among the names that the dissenting 20 Republicans voted for were former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-California), former Speaker-designate for Republicans Rep. Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana), former New York GOP congressman Lee Zeldin, Rep. Tom Massie (R-Kentucky), Rep. Tom Cole (R-Oklahoma), Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minnesota) and Rep. Mike Garcia (R-California).
While Jordan losing on the first ballot was a predicted outcome, what’s less certain is whether those 20 Republicans will change their votes in subsequent ballots. It’s possible that many simply voted against him this round because they wanted to show their constituents initial opposition, but will ultimately support him later on. A good handful of Republicans, however, are planning to oppose Jordan no matter what.
How many of those Republicans exist is anyone’s guess, and it’s unclear whether their numbers exceed the number of votes Jordan can afford to lose in order to be named speaker later on.
Jordan was nominated by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), a member of his leadership team. During her speech formally nominating him, Stefanik mentioned Jordan’s time as a wrestling coach, which elicited laughter and jeering from Democrats in the chamber due to allegations that Jordan ignored claims of sexual assault from his student-athletes at Ohio State University during his tenure there.
Democrats were united in voting for Jeffries, with no defections from within the conference. When Jeffries’s name was called to vote for himself, the Democratic side of the House gave him a standing ovation and cheered for several seconds. While Jordan received similar treatment from his conference when his name was called, some Republican lawmakers who were voting against him refused to stand.
After the vote tally was counted and made official, the House was adjourned for a recess, presumably to allow Jordan to court the wayward votes to support him in the next round. That vote’s success will likely determine if more votes are held later today — if no votes change, for example, it may cause Jordan to reconsider his run for the speakership. If a few names join in supporting him, however, it could mean more votes will be held later today or this week.
A second vote is likely to happen later on Tuesday. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) told Fox News’s Sean Hannity that he believes the next vote will happen around 6 p.m., although he didn’t appear optimistic regarding Jordan’s chances to win the speakership at that time, predicting that at least one of the 20 Republican lawmakers who voted for someone else would switch over to Jordan.
The speaker of the House position has been vacant for two weeks, leaving the House unable to conduct any business after former Speaker Rep. Kevin McCarthy was ousted from the position, becoming the first speaker in U.S. history to lose a motion to vacate vote in that chamber.
McCarthy himself only attained the position of speaker after multiple ballots were cast over the course of several days back in January. The amount of ballots that it took for him to win was viewed as an embarrassment to the party, as was his ouster from the position earlier this month. If Jordan fails to win in subsequent ballots and drops out of the speaker race, it could be yet another embarrassing moment for the party.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy