Two of the four Arizona Supreme Court justices who recently voted to re-implement an abortion ban from1864 could potentially be removed from their posts by voters this fall.
In a 4-2 decision issued on Tuesday, the state’s highest court said the territorial-era law should be re-implemented, citing the fact that it had not been overturned by any state law in the 160 years since its passage.
“Absent the federal constitutional abortion right, and because (a 15-week abortion law from 2022) does not independently authorize abortion, there is no provision in federal or state law prohibiting (the 1864 law’s) operation,” the justices ruled.
The law restricts nearly all access to abortion, making exceptions only in cases where the life of a pregnant person is at risk.
All four of the justices who voted in favor of the 1864 law being enacted were appointed by Republican governors.
Arizona, like 14 other states in the U.S., allows its governors to appoint justices to its highest court but gives voters the opportunity to vote them out later on. In Arizona, the initial retention vote takes place two years after justices are appointed. If a justice is not voted out, they will face another retention vote every six years; if they are removed, the current governor is allowed to appoint a new person to the state Supreme Court, albeit from a list provided by a statewide judicial commission.
Two justices who sided with the majority in Tuesday’s ruling — Justices Clint Bolick and Kathryn King — are up for retention votes this fall. Both justices were appointed by Republican Gov. Doug Ducey.
Bolick survived his first retention vote six years ago, while this will be the first retention vote for King.
Bolick is married to state Sen. Shawnna Bolick, a far right Republican and election fraud conspiracy theorist who has sponsored anti-transgender legislation in the current legislative session. The state senator is also anti-abortion, although she said in a post after the ruling that she would support repealing the territorial law in favor of a 15-week ban.
Critics of 15-week abortion bans have pointed out that they are still very dangerous, particularly for people who have pregnancy-related health issues beyond that timeframe.
According to Bolts Magazine, it’s rare for retention votes to result in a justice’s removal from the state Supreme Court, with the last such removal happening in 2014. However, the retention votes for these two justices will give Arizona voters — the vast majority of whom support expanding abortion rights — the ability to remove anti-abortion jurists. Given that a constitutional initiative expanding abortion rights to the time of “fetal viability” (generally regarded as 22-25 weeks of a pregnancy) is likely going to be on the ballot as well, it’s probable that these two justices will also become a focal point for abortion advocates in the state.
If the justices fail to win their retention votes, Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) will get to select two new justices to serve, shifting the court’s ideological balance slightly; instead of all seven justices having been appointed by former Republican governors, two of the seven will have been picked by a Democrat.
Behind the scenes, however, Republicans are pushing through a constitutional ballot measure of their own, to amend the state’s highest governing document to change the process of judicial retention altogether. Under that proposal, which is currently stalled in the state legislature but could be revived soon, justices of the state Supreme Court would serve lifetime appointments and never face retention votes except for in limited circumstances, including in cases where a justice has been convicted of a felony offense, convicted of a crime involving fraud or dishonesty, entered into bankruptcy or home foreclosure, or when a judicial commission has determined they do not meet standards to remain a justice.
Although highly unlikely, it’s possible that Arizona Republicans could revive and fast-track this amendment proposal, including it on the state’s primary election ballot in late July in order to stop efforts by pro-abortion groups to remove Bolick and King from their positions — much like how Ohio Republicans tried (and failed) to thwart an abortion initiative in 2023 by placing a question of their own on that year’s primary ballot, prior to an abortion rights initiative that ended up winning in the general election.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.