Ten Democratic lawmakers are joining as plaintiffs in a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump over his role in the attack on the United States Capitol on January 6.
The lawsuit, filed earlier this year by Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) and the NAACP, is targeting Trump as well as his former lawyer Rudy Giuliani and two recognized hate groups, the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys, by invoking a little-known law that was passed in the Reconstruction era.
The law, implemented to deal with the Ku Klux Klan at the time, allows civil litigation against anyone who uses “force, intimidation, or threat[s]” to prevent government officials from upholding their duties. The lawsuit makes the claim that’s exactly what Trump and his allies did up to and during the Capitol breach, which disrupted the certification of the Electoral College results.
Trump, Giuliani, and the other co-defendants “acted in concert to spearhead the assault on the Capitol while the angry mob that Defendants Trump and Giuliani incited descended on the Capitol,” the lawsuit alleges.
The 10 additional lawmakers, all Democrats, who are joining Thompson and the civil rights organization in the lawsuit hail from seven different states across the country. They include: Representatives Karen Bass, Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee from California; Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee; Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman of New Jersey; Rep. Veronica Escobar from Texas; Rep. Hank Johnson from Georgia; Rep. Marcy Kaptur from Ohio; Rep. Jerry Nadler from New York; and Rep. Pramila Jayapal from Washington.
A press release from NAACP announcing the additional plaintiffs to the lawsuit stated these lawmakers “were all prevented from carrying out their constitutional duties to certify the 2020 presidential election due to the violent mob that had overtaken the Capitol.”
“The lawsuit seeks to use the justice system to hold Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani and the violent white supremacists who participated in the insurrection accountable for their attack on democracy,” the organization added.
Several of the lawmakers now involved in the lawsuit placed direct blame on the former president for the violence that occurred at the Capitol complex that day.
“As I sat in my office on January 6th with rioters roaming the hallways, I feared for my life and thought I was going to die,” Representative Cohen said in a statement. “This invasion was a direct result of Donald Trump’s rhetoric and words.”
Aside from the current 11 members of Congress who are suing Trump and others for their role in the Capitol breach, a second lawsuit, filed by Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-California), was also filed in March. In addition to Trump and Giuliani, Swalwell’s litigation also names Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Alabama), who took part in the rousing speeches on January 6 prior to the attack on the Capitol, as a co-defendant.
Recent polling demonstrates that nearly three in five Americans believe Trump bears partial responsibility for the violence that took place that day. Multiple individuals were injured during the breach of the Capitol, and five individuals were killed as a result.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.