Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Agencies Fail to Report on Environmental Risks for Low-Income Communities

During the Obama era, nearly all government agencies filed reports on environmental justice.

Trucks and cars drive past a children's playground on the Cross Bronx Expressway on May 25, 2017 in the Bronx, New York. The highway is one of the busiest in the nation, and the neighborhoods above it have very high levels of asthma in their communities.

Just as this administration’s commitment to caring for the environment is poor, its commitment to working toward environmental justice may be lax at best.

The Trump administration inherited an interagency working group on environmental justice — 16 agencies that are supposed to work to address “the disproportionately high distribution of health and environmental risks among low-income and minority communities by seeking their fair treatment and meaningful involvement in environmental policy.”

The nonpartisan General Accountability Office (GAO) was asked to review those environmental justice efforts but found them lacking.

The working group doesn’t just include agencies that directly deal with the environment, such as the Department of the Interior and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It also includes agencies such as the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, and more. Each agency is supposed to provide a yearly progress report explaining what actions they’ve taken to address environmental justice.

During the Obama era, nearly all agencies filed those reports. Since Trump took office, though, that number has plummeted to only four agencies filing the required reports for 2017. Many agencies also haven’t updated their environmental justice strategic plans. The Department of Commerce even went so far as to say it simply hasn’t updated that plan because it would take too much time and resources.

Even in previous administrations, the work of a group that spans multiple agencies was sometimes difficult to quantify. However, the GAO noted, one of the best ways for it to determine whether progress was being made was simply for the agencies to file their yearly progress reports. That would seem like a relatively noncontroversial option, but only in an administration that valued the environment and environmental justice. Under Trump, several agencies are outright refusing the GAO’s recommendation of yearly reports.

For example, the Department of Transportation (DOT) stated it would only commit to providing reports “when it determines that the circumstances of its activities so warrant.” DOT’s activities, though, should also warrant a report. Impoverished communities are often surrounded by freeways, leading to far higher amounts of diesel air pollution.

Similarly, the Department of Education under Secretary Betsy DeVos has refused to commit because the agency “does not believe this is the most appropriate course of action for the department or an efficient use of resources.” That’s because even though schools in poor and minority communities are often demonstrably less safe in terms of what students may be exposed to, the Department of Education lacks authority to regulate much of that, as it is addressed at the state level. However, as the GAO points out, a new strategic plan would help Education guide its future environmental justice activities, presumably within the scope of their authority.

It’s telling that some agencies under Trump don’t even feel like they need to update the public as to their efforts to close the environmental justice gap, but given the administration’s notorious disregard for the environment generally, it isn’t surprising.

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $23,000 before midnight tomorrow to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?