As protests continue over the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, the United States is facing pressure internationally over its failure to put a halt to police brutality. In a new report, the United Nations Committee Against Torture expresses deep concern over the “frequent and recurrent police shootings or fatal pursuits of unarmed black individuals.” The Committee also criticizes a number of other U.S. practices on torture and imprisonment, Guantánamo Bay, and the custody of migrants including children in “prison-like detention facilities.” We discuss the report’s findings with Dr. Jens Modvig, member of the Committee Against Torture and one of two rapporteurs for its report.
TRANSCRIPT:
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: As protests continue over the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the United States is facing pressure internationally over its failure to put a halt to police brutality. In a new report the United Nations Committee Against Torture Expresses deep concern over the “frequent and recurrent police shootings or fatal pursuits of unarmed black individuals.” The panel’s report was published following a series of hearings in Geneva last month. Michael Brown’s parents testified before the panel. Michael Brown SR. spoke to the press after his testimony.
MICHAEL BROWN SR.: This trip is very important for the family, making a powerful step towards justice. We need your help. That’s why we’re here. We need the help to get this done. That’s we’re here.
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: The United Nations Committee questions Against Torture also questions a number of other U.S. practices. On torture and imprisonment it criticizes the White Houses refusal to prosecute officials in the George W. Bush administration for torture and to provide redress to their victims. It also faults the United States for the indefinite imprisonment of foreign nationals at Guantánamo Bay, and calls for an end to force feedings.
AMY GOODMAN: The U.N. torture panel also calls on the Obama administration to release the Senate report on C.I.A. torture, “in the most complete and comprehensible form possible.” This comes as Senate Democrats have accused the White House of trying to censor key portions. the panel also called for ending U.S. custody of migrants, including children in “prison-like detention facilities.” To talk more about the U.N. report, we go to Copenhagen, Denmark where we’re joined by Dr. Jens Modvig. He’s a member of the U.N. Committee Against Torture, was one of two rapporteurs for the most recent U.N. report on torture in the U.S. He’s also Chief Medical Officer at Dignity, The Danish Institute Against Torture. We welcome you to Democracy Now!, Dr. Jens Modvig. So, this was your first report on torture, the U.N. Committee’s report on torture since 2006. Why do it now, so many years later, and talk about your main findings.
DR. JENS MODVIG: Well, it should be remembered that the convention against torture which has been signed by 156 countries in the world including he United States, obliges the state parties to send, regularly, actually after each four years, a report to the committee on what has been the progress in terms of implementing, and the prohibition of torture, and preventing that torture takes place. So, this is a regular report from the United States and it’s a regular review by the committee against torture.
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And did the — did United States officials participate in your investigation or provide testimony to your panel as well? And if so, who was it that participated?
DR. JENS MODVIG: Yes, as is normally the case, there was a delegation; 27 officials from United States headed by Ambassador Keith Harper and Assistant Secretary of State Tom Malinowski, including the acting legal advisor of the Department of State, Ms. Mary McCleod. So, we had an oral Q&A session over two days with the U.S. delegation and the committee had the opportunity to put questions to the report from the United States.
AMY GOODMAN: Last month, while the U.S. was presenting its record on human rights to the U.N. committee in Geneva, a group of youth activists from Chicago rose to their feet with their hands in the air to stage a silent protest. They wore T-shirts bearing the name of Dominique Franklin, a 23-year-old who died in June after police tasered him during an arrest for stealing a bottle of vodka. A member of the group We Charge Genocide, Malcolm London, said the response by U.S. officials at the hearing has been inadequate.
MALCOLM LONDON: Every day in the States, in the City of Chicago, We Charge Genocide has a report that is online for anyone who wants to view it that documents every single day that police violate rights, abuse, sexually assault, murder and kill, particularly people who look like me, who are black and who are brown. And that is devastating. And what the state brought today does not at all cover and or answer those questions, and is inadequate. And while we’re dying in the streets, and the State Department is patting themselves on the back because they let us stand in a room; we’re not fighting for the right to stand in this room, we’re fighting for the right to be alive.
AMY GOODMAN: That’s Malcolm London from Chicago, the group We Charge Genocide. He was in Geneva. Dr. Jens Modvig, if you could talk about this issue of police brutality and the significance of the parents of Michael Brown coming to testify.
DR. JENS MODVIG: Well, the Committee Against Torture takes an interest in the measures that United States has in place to control excessive use of force and police brutality. These measures is are — entail that all alleged cases are investigated, prosecuted and punished. And when we look at the statistics, we heard from the United States delegation that during the last five years, a little over 300 hundred cases have been criminally prosecuted of police officers. We asked for the resource of these prosecutions but we have not received this information. So, where there’s still doubt as to whether the mechanisms to hold police officers accountable for excessive use of force, police brutality and even police shootings are probably in place. Another issue of importance is whether there is independent oversight bodies that can check up on the way that the power’s administered in the law enforcement. And also here we have some doubts whether police review boards are sufficiently independent. So, these are some of the concerns that committee has expressed vis-a-vis the United States Delegation.
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And Dr. Modvig, could you put this in context, what’s occurring here in the United States, vis-a-vis other advanced industrialized nations; this whole issue of excessive force or killings by police of civilians as they perform their law enforcement functions. Is the United States more or less similar to other countries, or is there an outlier in terms of the amount of force used against its citizens?
DR. JENS MODVIG: Well, that’s difficult to assess exactly because there is not full transparency. We have asked the United States delegation for complete statistics about alleged excessive use of force and the reactions in terms of investigations and prosecutions and punishments. And this is the means to obtain transparency in this field. This is the recommendations that the committee have been doing towards United States.
AMY GOODMAN: And can you go through those recommendations?
DR. JENS MODVIG: They are that each case of alleged excessive use of force, each complaint over police officers, needs to be fully investigated by an independent body. And in case there are basis for prosecution, then the prosecution should be done and if found guilty, the police officers should be punished accordingly. Further, the victims that have been subjected to excessive use of force should be able to receive remedy for this.
AMY GOODMAN: Do you have an opinion on the grand jury decision that was handed down against the police officer who killed Mike Brown, no indictment?
DR. JENS MODVIG: No, I think the committee respects the decision of the grand jury. We are not in a position to evaluate that.
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: I want to play for you comments President Obama made six years ago shortly before he took office about whether the CIA officials involved in torture should be prosecuted. He appeared on the ABC news program This Week.
PRES. OBAMA: I don’t believe that anybody is above the law. On the other hand, i also have a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards. And part of my job is to make sure that, for example, at the CIA, you have extraordinarily talented people who are working very hard to keep Americans safe. I don’t want them to suddenly feel like they’ve got to spend all of their time looking over their shoulders and lawyering.
AMY GOODMAN: Dr. Modvig, your response to that and what you found around the issue of torture?
DR. JENS MODVIG: There is no doubt according to the convention against torture, state parties has a very clear obligation to investigate cases of torture, to prosecute perpetrators of torture, and to punish severely according to the serious nature of the crime of torture. It is a very clear obligation according to the convention.
AMY GOODMAN: What about your findings at Guantánamo? Can you talk about what has happened in the United States over this period since 2001. President Obama, one of his first executive orders, closing Guantánamo within a year — of course, that hasn’t happened and it’s well over six years later.
DR. JENS MODVIG: On a positive note, the U.S. Delegation recognized that the convention and its absolute prohibition against torture and intreatment also applies to extra territories outside the U.S. where the U.S. has government authority. And that this includes Guantánamo. So, first and foremost, there is no doubt that the prohibition against torture also applies for Guantánamo detainees. However, the committee has raised concern about the continued indefinite detention in Guantánamo. Apparently, the number of hunger strikes that are implemented by the detainees in protest of the detention conditions and certainly, also, the procedures that are made official of how hunger strikers are force fed, a treatment that definitely amounts to intreatment and possibly even to torture.
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Dr. Modvig, your report also talks about the death penalty and especially singles out an issue that we’ve covered extensively here on Democracy Now!, the issue of botched executions in the United States. Could you talk about that? The committee has made two recommendations in connection with the execution of death penalty. The first one is to recommend to the United States to make a moratorium, that is to stop the execution of the death penalties. And secondly, to review the procedures for executions. And the reason is, obviously that there has been a number of procedural irregularities in connection with execution of death penalties which have caused unnecessary, severe pain and suffering to those that were going to be executed.
AMY GOODMAN: Back on the issue of Guantánamo, do you feel government officials should be prosecuted?
DR. JENS MODVIG: I have no personal feelings in this respect. I’m only speaking about what committee has recommended. And obviously, to the degree that torture is been committed or intreatment has been committed, the United States has an obligation according to international law to prosecute those responsible for this.
AMY GOODMAN: Finally, the issue of solitary confinement in juvenile justice in the United States, what you found.
DR. JENS MODVIG: There seems to be a disagreement between the United States delegation and the committee on whether the use of solitary confinement is widespread or not. In the committee, we have information that it is certainly very widespread. But, this gives rise to one of the two recommendations, namely, to provide full statistics of the use of solitary confinement, including which groups are subjected to solitary confinement and for how long. The second recommendation of the committee is to regulate much more closely the use of solitary confinement in terms of how long it can be applied and which groups should be absolutely exempt from solitary confinement. For instance, minors and persons with mental health disorders. And also that the government publishes statistics about cases of suicide, attempted suicide, and self harm that occur among those subjected to solitary confinement.
AMY GOODMAN: Dr. Jens Modvig, we want to thank you —
DR. JENS MODVIG: This is a practice that we know, from scientific studies, is mentally harmful, so it should be reduced to an absolute minimum.
AMY GOODMAN: We want to thank you for being with us, Dr. Jens Modvig is Chief Medical Officer at Dignity, The Danish Institute Against Torture.
DR. JENS MODVIG: Thank you, You’re welcome.
AMY GOODMAN: A member of the U.N. Committee Against Torture, was one of two rapporteurs for the most recent U.N. report on torture in the U.S. We will link to your report at democracynow.org. When we come back, we go to Berlin to learn about a new drone report and then to Syracuse, New York, a father of four facing two years in prison for protesting outside a drone base outside Syracuse, New York. Stay with us.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy