British warplanes have begun bombing targets in Syria just hours after British lawmakers voted 397 to 223 to support Prime Minister David Cameron’s plan for airstrikes. The warplanes took off from an airbase in Cyprus. They struck oil fields in eastern Syria controlled by the self-proclaimed Islamic State. The decision to bomb Syria divided the opposition Labour Party in Britain. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn opposed the bombing but was challenged from within his own party by foreign affairs spokesperson Hilary Benn. Lawmakers held a 10 hour debate on Wednesday, and we air an extended excerpt of Corbyn and Benn along with Prime Minister David Cameron.
TRANSCRIPT
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: British warplanes have begun bombing targets in Syria just hours after British lawmakers voted 397 to 223 to support Prime Minister David Cameron’s plan for air strikes. The warplanes took off from an airbase in Cyprus. They struck oil fields in eastern Syria controlled by the self-proclaimed Islamic State. The decision to bomb Syria divided the opposition Labour Party in Britain. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn opposed the bombing, but was challenged by foreign affairs spokesman Hilary Benn. Lawmakers held a 10 hour debate on Wednesday. We’ll hear from Corbyn and Benn, but first, Prime Minister David Cameron.
PM DAVID CAMERON: In moving this motion, I’m not pretending that the answers are simple. The situation in Syria is incredibly complex. I’m not overstating the contribution that our incredible service men and women can make, neither am I ignoring the risks of military action nor am I pretending that military action is any more than one part of the answer. I’m absolutely clear that we must pursue a comprehensive strategy that also includes political, diplomatic, and humanitarian action. And I know that the long-term solution in Syria, as in Iraq, must ultimately be a government that represents all of its people, and one that can work with us to defeat the evil organization of ISIL for good.
SPEAKER JOHN BERCOW: I call the leader of the opposition, Mr. Jeremy Corbyn.
MP JEREMY CORBYN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The whole house recognizes that decisions to send British forces to war are the most serious, solemn, and morally challenging of any that we have to take as members of Parliament. The motion brought before the house today by the government authorizing military action in Syria against ISIL faces us with exactly that decision. It is one with potentially far-reaching consequences for us all here in Britain as well as the people of Syria and the wider Middle East.
For all members, take a decision that will put British servicemen and women in harm’s way, add almost inevitably lead to the deaths of innocents is a heavy responsibility. It must be treated with the utmost seriousness and respect given to those who make a different judgment about the right course of action to take. Which is why the Prime Minister’s attempt to brand those who plan to vote against the government as terrorist sympathizers, both demeans the office of the Prime Minister and, I believe, undermines the seriousness of deliberations we’re having today. If the prime and us are now wants to apologize for those remarks, I would be happy to give way to him to do so. Since, Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is unmoved, we’ll have to move on with the debate and I hope he will be stronger later to recognize that, yes, he did make an unfortunate remark last night and apologizing for it would be very helpful to improve the atmosphere of this debate today.
SPEAKER JOHN BERCOW: Mr. Hilary Benn.
MP HILARY BENN: We are here faced by fascists, not just their calculated brutality, but their belief that they are superior to every single one of us in this chamber tonight, and all of the people that we represent. They hold us in contempt. They hold our values in contempt. They hold our belief in tolerance and decency in contempt. They hold our democracy, the means by which we will make our decision tonight, in contempt. But what we know about fascists, is that they need to be defeated. And it is why as we have heard tonight, socialists and trade unionists and others join the international brigade in the 1930’s to fight against Franco. It’s why this entire house stood up against Hitler and Mussolini. It is why our party has always stood up against the denial of human rights and for justice. And my view, Mr. Speaker, is that we must now confront this evil. It is now time for us to do our bit in Syria. And that is why I asked my colleagues to vote for this motion tonight.
AMY GOODMAN: That’s British Labor Parliamentarian, Hilary Benn, yes, the son of the famous antiwar late Parliamentarian, Tony Benn, preceded by Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn and British Prime Minister David Cameron.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.