US Marine Corps and US Army explosive ordnance disposal technicians at work in 2006. The New York Times reported that US soldiers uncovered caches of old and degraded chemical weapons in Iraq. (Photo: Expert Infantry)Ted Asregadoo talks to Truthout senior editor and lead columnist William Rivers Pitt about a recent New York Times piece on chemical weapons found in Iraq between 2004 and 2011 – and Bush administration efforts to silence news of their discovery.
Also see: George W. Bush: The Gift That Keeps on Giving
Williams Rivers Pitt and I have been acquainted since 2003. Our professional relationship started when I used to host a public affairs radio program in the San Francisco Bay Area. He was a frequent guest whose opinion and sharp political eye were a welcome addition to the almost non-stop pro-Iraq invasion voices that dominated the airwaves. The lies told to the American public by the Bush Administration and parroted by the overwhelming majority of voices in the media constituted one of the most effective propaganda campaigns to sell a war since Vietnam. We were told over and over and over that the Hussein regime possessed stockpiles of chemical weapons of mass destruction, was procuring yellow cake uranium from Niger, was connected to Al Qaeda and was developing an active nuclear weapons program. Or as President Bush said in a speech to the American people in 2002, “Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof – the smoking gun – that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.”
Images of mushroom clouds, terrorists, and the specter of Americans and/or close allies with boils and burns caused by chemical weapons were enough to scare an already emotionally vulnerable public into supporting an invasion of Iraq because of the threats Saddam Hussein posed to the free world. The propaganda campaign worked. But very soon after the invasion, it became clear that the stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons the Bush Administration told the public about was nowhere to be found. However, in 2004 – and right until 2011 – US soldiers did find chemical weapons in Iraq, but they weren’t the weapons we were told about. As The New York Times reported, these weapons were manufactured and sold to Iraq by a combination of American, Spanish, French, German and Italian companies. These were the weapons Hussein used in his war with Iran and on his own people. The caches of these old, rusted and degraded weapons were certainly lethal, but not in a form to be used as the weapons of mass destruction that Hussein’s regime supposedly stockpiled.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy