Jared Rodriguez / Truthout; Adapted: LizaP)” width=”308″ height=”437″ />(Image: Jared Rodriguez / Truthout; Adapted: LizaP)On Friday, John DeLong, the top NSA official in charge of making sure that NSA analysts comply with rules and regulations protecting the privacy of Americans, responded to reports that the NSA had frequently violated privacy rules.
Speaking to reporters on a conference call, DeLong was responding to the Washington Post’s report that a leaked internal NSA audit revealed there had been 2,776 “incidents” of violations in a one-year period.
DeLong told reporters that the majority of violations were unintentional human or technical errors, and that the number of intentional errors by NSA analysts was “minuscule,” involving only a couple over the past decade.
While Mr. DeLong’s classifying of these thousands of NSA privacy violations as “minuscule” is fairly disturbing, it does raise the question: What crimes are considered “minuscule” in America, but are still fully prosecuted under the law?
For instance, shoplifting a piece of jewelry from a department store is usually considered a small or “minuscule” crime. But, the majority of the time the thief is still arrested and prosecuted under the law, and given a punishment ranging from a fine and community service to jail time.
What about assault? If a husband slaps his wife around, that’s fairly “minuscule” compared to stabbing or shooting her, right? Even so, the husband is still usually arrested, charged with assault and/or battery, and punished for his crimes.
Then there are those annoying parking and driving violations that we all hate to get. Even though parking in a space with an expired parking meter seems like it’s “minuscule,” more often than not, a parking enforcement officer will still hand you a ticket and a fine.
Similarly, while driving a few miles per hour over a posted speed limit may seem “minuscule,” speed cameras will still catch you, and you’ll find a ticket in your mail within a matter of weeks.
Finally, what if a thief steals a person’s credit card, which has a $30,000 spending limit on it, but only charges $100 on the card before he or she is caught? While that may seem “minuscule,” the thief will almost certainly be arrested, charged with credit card fraud or identity theft, and handed down heavy fines and jail time.
The point to all of this is that in the American justice system, even if a crime is considered to be “minuscule,” the perpetrator is still arrested and punished.
But, under Mr. DeLong’s logic, he would have us do away with all of these “minuscule” crimes, and let the people who commit them go unpunished. America would quickly turn into a shoplifter’s and parking violator’s paradise.
While our justice system has failed miserably at sending banksters to jail over the past several years, when it’s at its best, all Americans are held accountable for their crimes, no matter how petty or “minuscule” those crimes may seem, and no matter how powerful or influential their perpetrators may be.
And that should include our government.
We must hold our government, the people who have the power to throw us in jail, to the same standard as the rest of us.
If there have been 2,776 incidents of NSA analysts violating the privacy rights of Americans over the past year, then everybody from the analysts to the head of the agency should be held accountable for their actions.
No one should be above the law in America.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.