Skip to content Skip to footer
|

We Need More Officer Katies and Fewer RoboCops

Rather than supporting effective policing techniques that can help to prevent crime, Conservatives are throwing millions of dollars at more high-tech things, like armor and weaponry for SWAT teams, helping to create a hyper militarized police force in America.

The story of Amanda Berry, Gina DeJesus and Michelle Knight, the three girls kidnapped in Cleveland, Ohio and held captive for ten years, has captivated the nation.

In the days since the three women escaped from the house where they were being held, many have speculated as to why they weren’t found sooner, especially since Cleveland police had visited the house on prior occasions, and since neighbors had reportedly called the police over strange behavior at the house multiple times.
One notion that has been floated around as a possible reason for why the girls were not found sooner is the decline of community policing and preventative policing in America.
The federal Community Oriented Policing Services program, or COPS, which provides resources for local police forces around the country was initiated in 1994 during the Clinton administration, as part of an effort to put 100,000 police officers on America’s streets.
Unfortunately, ever since the Bush administration began, the COPS program has seen its funding continually slashed by hundreds of millions of dollars, thanks to Conservatives in Congress, hell-bent on creating militarized local police forces, to complement our nation’s military industrial complex.
Rather than supporting effective policing techniques that can help to prevent crime, Conservatives are throwing millions of dollars at more high-tech things, like armor and weaponry for SWAT teams, helping to create a hyper militarized police force in America.
In 2010, $792 million was allotted in the form of federal grants under the COPS program for local police forces across the country; By 2012, that number had shrunken to just $199 million.
As a result of this drastic underfunding, police forces across the nation find themselves unable to adequately police their districts, and the ideas of community policing, and building a report with citizens are just pipe dreams.
And that’s very unfortunate, because community policing really works.
Just ask Madison, Wisconsin police officer Katie Adler.
Adler is a neighborhood officer in the crime-ridden North Side area of Madison. Unlike regular patrol cops in Madison, neighborhood officers are put in at-risk communities, to help make a difference, building relationships with citizens in the hopes preventing future crime.
Every day, Adler walks the beat in a half-dozen apartment complex communities. In five years, Adler has built up relationships with hundreds of community members, and its rare for her to see someone she doesn’t know.
Officer Katie, as everyone calls her, is beloved in the communities that she patrols, so much so that kids follow her wherever she goes. She’s even inspiring children in the communities to become police officers when they grow up.
Now, of course Officer Katie’s passion for the job and her relationships with community members can’t stop every crime from occurring. But if she’s able to stop just one person from making the wrong decision, it’s a job well done.
Unfortunately, Office Katie is the last of a dying breed.
Community officers looking to prevent crime are being replaced by police officers that are almost looking to provoke it, using high-tech gismos that belong on the front-lines of war, not on America’ s streets.
If you don’t believe me, just look at footage from Occupy Wall Street protests, anti-war rallies and even protests outside of last year’s Republican National Convention.
It’s crazy how militarized our police forces have become.
Even police officers recognize how out-of-whack policing in America has become.
On last night’s episode of The Big Picture, we talking about the downfall of community policing in America.

Marc Harrold, a libertarian commentator and former police officer, said that he had concerns about the federal government, and Congress, prioritizing how local police forces allocate their resources.

He also said that programs like COPS had been de-funded because of America’s addiction to the failed war on drugs, which has given rise to the militarized police forces that we see today.
The bottom-line is that community policing works. It has a positive impact on reducing levels of crime, it helps to reduce the fear of crime in communities, and it helps enhance the quality of life overall in communities.

If there had been an “Officer Katy” on the beat in the Cleveland neighborhood where Amanda Berry, Gina DeJesus and Michelle Knight were originally kidnapped, these women may never have had to face the horrors that they did over the last decade, or, at the very least, could have been saved much earlier.

It’s time to throw away the battering rams and ditch the armored vehicles.
We need fewer SWAT teams with militarized weaponry in America, and more Officer Katie’s.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.