Skip to content Skip to footer

Pelosi Refuses to Back Single Payer, Despite GOP Deathmongering Suddenly Taking Center Stage

While Democrats have shown an interest in saving lives, their leader is wasting an opportunity to advocate for those left uninsured by Obamacare.

(Photo: Michael Fleshman / Flickr)

Democrats are endeavoring to point out that tens of thousands of Americans face a death sentence if House Republicans’ current healthcare plan is signed into law.

“With the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, it is estimated that 43,956 people will die,” Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) said Thursday morning, on the House floor. “Long live the Republican Party.”

But while Dems have shown an interest in saving lives, their leader is wasting an opportunity to advocate for the 27 million Americans left completely uninsured by Obamacare.

“No, I don’t,” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) promptly said, when asked by a reporter if she thinks single payer should be in Democrats’ 2018 party platform.

“I was carrying single payer signs probably around before you born, so I understand that aspiration,” the House Minority Leader told Vice’s Evan McMorris-Santoro. She then claimed that “the comfort level with a broader base of the American people is not there yet,” with single payer.

“So I say to people: if you want it, do it in your states. States are laboratories,” the Dem leader added. “States are a good place to start,” she also said.

Pelosi’s assertions about single payer’s popularity, however, are called into question by public polling.

Last year, Gallup found that 58 percent of the country wants single payer to replace Obamacare, while only 37 percent oppose such a move. Other recent polls, too, have found that either a clear majority or plurality of Americans support single-payer. And polling also has shown that the most vociferous advocate of single payer, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), is the most popular politician in the country, by a wide margin.

Pelosi’s assertion that “states are a good place to start” is also questionable, given recent history. Sanders’ Vermont attempted to create a single payer system after Obamacare passed, but state officials got cold feet and abandoned the plan in 2014.

And though House Democrats’ leader was not even open to considering the idea of single payer on Thursday morning — with America’s healthcare system suddenly back in the limelight — House Republicans were tying their opponents to the initiative.

“Those defending this legislation had a goal,” Rep. Keith Rothfus (R-Pa.) said, referring to Obamacare. “Single payer, socialized medicine.”

The House found itself discussing Republican healthcare plans on Thursday morning, after members of the party caucus agreed to support a revised version of the Obamacare repeal plan that failed to even come up for a vote in March.

The new iteration of the plan passed on Thursday afternoon. It was changed to allow states to opt-out of the Obamacare mandate on preexisting conditions. Republicans are proposing $8 billion for state-run high-risk pools, as a replacement. Critics, like the American Medical Association, said that this would still do “serious harm.”

The March proposal would have cut coverage from some 24 million people, according to Congressional analyses. Republicans are moving their current proposal through the House without waiting for another analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy