This is a supplement to Truthout’s four-part investigative series on the Chicago Police Department and the Independent Police Review Authority, which includes Part I: As Chicago Police Kill Youth, Vast Misconduct Allegations Purged, Part II: Young Life vs. Deadly Force: The Training and Racism of Police Shootings and Part III: How the “Gold Standard” of Police Accountability Fails Civilians by Design.
Nine months after the fatal police shooting of their 14-year-old son, Laura and Pedro Rios Sr. filed a federal civil suit on April 9, 2015, by way of their lawyer, Mark Brown of Lane and Lane.
The complaint – naming the City of Chicago and as yet unknown police officers – includes a grim, new allegation. The lawsuit also represents the beginning of a court battle, to release video of the deadly encounter.
After crossing paths with a squad car on Cicero Avenue, the boy ran.
According to the complaint, “The officers then pursued Rios in their squad car before striking him with the vehicle,” going on to allege that an officer exited the car and shot the 14-year-old, laying prone in an alley.
Addressing police accusations, which justified the shooting, claiming the child brandished a weapon, Brown told media, “If he was indeed carrying a weapon … it’s not a death sentence. A police officer who sees somebody with a weapon doesn’t have unabashed authority to shoot that person and kill them.”
Through an exclusive investigation, Truthout uncovered alarming discrepancies among various official accounts and records of the incident – from the Chicago Police Department, the Cook County Medical Examiner and the Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA), the public agency responsible for investigation complaints of misconduct and all officer-involved shootings.
Shot twice in the back – a detail undisclosed in prior media coverage – Rios’ autopsy report details the trajectory of the boy’s bullet wounds. Coursing upward through his 110-pound frame, the bullet wounds revealed that Rios was unlikely to have been shot in any manner but face down on the ground, as the suit alleges.
Taking place at the site of a surveillance supply company, the shooting was captured on video, in possession of the authorities. Carrying charges of excessive force and wrongful death, the complaint will be followed by an emergency motion to protect footage of the child’s killing.
A 12-year-old Pedro Rios Jr. in photography club at the swing (left). (Courtesy Tom Callahan)
Rios’ mother, Laura Rios, has stated repeatedly that the family wants to know what happened the night of her son’s death – a request repeated at a press conference outside of the family’s home announcing the lawsuit. Queried multiple times on the shooting by Truthout, the Chicago Police Department did not respond to requests for comment. The City of Chicago Department of Law likewise did not offer comment to media after the suit was announced.
Speaking at length with Truthout, by way of an interpreter, Laura Rios said, “It all feels so wrong. I’m mad about what they did to my child. There has to be some justice. I want justice and to know the truth. That’s all I want. That’s all my husband wants.”
“We will never forget him.”
Truthout’s four-part investigative series, tracking the shooting of Pedro Rios Jr. and public agencies responsible for Chicago Police Department oversight will resume next week.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.