Austerity policies continue to deliver pain to populations the world over. In Greece, the process has been exceptionally painful. Yet shifts toward worker ownership and democratic self-direction deliver much-needed hope.
The workers at the Viomichaniki Metalleutiki (Vio.Me) factory in Thessaloniki, Greece have adopted the motto that originated with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement (MST) in the 1980s: āOccupy, Resist, Produce!ā The factory, which makes mortars, plasters, tile adhesives and other building materials, started production under worker control on February 13, 2013. Putting into practice in their own lives the principles of autogestiĆ³n (self-direction, or leaderless self-management) developed in occupied workplaces across Latin America, the worker-owners at Vio.Me are trying to prefigure a better future in the present, in large part because they were left with little choice.
The previous owners of the factory stopped paying employees in May 2011. They abandoned workers in a manner similar to that by which the Greek government, at the behest of the Troika, abandoned the majority of its population, severing the social contract.
The Social Preconditions for Emerging Economic Alternatives in Greece
The 2007-2008 global economic implosion, government corruption, state collusion with Wall Street, eurozone travails and a structural adjustment program imposed upon the people by international investors, in familiar neoliberal fashion, yielded predictable consequences. Bailouts and mass privatization benefited banks, but ālittle actually went to Greek workers who fell into severe poverty,ā economist Marjolein Van Der Veen explains. The Greek governmentās āself-destructive dance with the Troika of foreign lenders ā the European Union (EU), The European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF),ā as Leonidas Oikonomakis and JĆ©rĆ“me Roos assert, initiated an ongoing tango of social turmoil.
Increased wage polarization, along with fiscal consolidation, contributed to deterioration of the labor market situation, failed to fix the protracted crisis, came up short in stabilizing public debt, and also did not seriously reduce the deficit or curb unemployment, according to the 2013 World of Work Report published by the International Labor Organization.
Social unrest increased in countries throughout the eurozone and Greece was among those that experienced some of the most pronounced unrest during 2010-2012, the report documented: āThis increase in the risk of unrest in the European Union is likely to be due to the policy responses to the ongoing sovereign debt crisis and their impacts on peopleās lives and perceptions of well-being.ā
Even the IMF now admits it failed to recognize the damage austerity would do to Greece. The mistakes are nothing new, and make sense if conceptualized as part of a neoliberal project designed to maximize profits, concentrate wealth and accelerate capital accumulation at all costs.
Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine, recently told a Greek audience, āYouāre living these shocks every day of your lives.ā
She added: āGreeks know that the debt crisis is being exaggerated. Itās being deepened so that it can provide the prextext for wrenching austerity measures and in order sell off your natural assets and your natural resources. This you know.ā
And those austerity cuts continue apace. Recently, the government shut down ERT, the countryās state broadcaster, leaving 600 journalists unemployed, punctuating the latest installment in the protracted socioeconomic strife.
The Self-Management Solution: Work in Progress
Protests erupted when the crisis first hit. People occupied public spaces like Syntagma Square and held popular assemblies. A small group of little-known organizers from Thessaloniki first called for the occupation of Syntagma. Before too long, many came together to form solutions from below. Workers at Vio.Me decided to start down the path toward self-management, for reasons of pure exigency.
āWe must understand that the more difficult the conditions are, the more determined are those who experience them, and they are more determined because all they have to lose is subjugation,ā said a spokesperson for Thessalonikiās Open Solidarity Initiative, the organization supporting Vio.Me, via email correspondence. āWhen we faced that situation, the unemployment and the poverty, the decision-making ā at least for most of us ā was only a matter of survival.ā
When unemployment first neared 30 percent in Greece, they proclaimed ātheir determination not to fall prey to a condition of perpetual unemployment, but instead to take the factory in their own hands to operate themselves.ā
AutogestiĆ³n seemed necessary. However, it has not been easy. Colleagues who previously worked at the factory resigned during the course of the turmoil, ābut most of them are waiting to see how the situation is going so as to return if things go better,ā the workers said.
Van Der Veen reported that the workers ādo not intend to buy out the owners, since the company owed the workers a significant amount of money when it abandoned the factory.ā
That is partly correct. But the challenges of worker-ownership within a capitalist economy, intimations of state repression, recalcitrant corporate control and ever-evolving political-economic circumstances require more nuanced attention to the unfolding process.
The workers actually made a genuine offer to the ministry to take the factory in their ownership. āAn offer that ā of course ā was not accepted,ā they said. āSo we try to find another solution.ā
Efforts to prefigure alternative institutional arrangements appear insuperable at times. As the Vio.Me web site states, āThe costs of production are high, access to credit is impossible and getting a part of the market in times of recession is uncertain.ā
Despite hurdles to direct economic democracy, they remain hopeful and focused.
āOur priority is to keep all unionās member[s] equally involved,ā in relation to the struggle, they say, āso as to maintain the hope and interest of everyone that takes part in the production.ā
Through discussion, deliberation, dialogue ā the same sort of workplace processes which define their prefigurative politics ā the unionized laborers intend to overcome their conditions together, without well-paid elites telling them what to do. Nevertheless, adversity is not going away anytime soon.
āWe are always going to face problems and for that we have abolished all the management and administrative councils and solve them, all the workers in common, through assembly,ā the spokesperson for the Solidarity Initiative explained.
Vio.Me operates, in the main, on principles of horizontalidad, a process part and parcel with autogestiĆ³n. Sociologist Marina Sitrin describes it as āa living word, reflecting an ever-changing experience,ā that āis not an ideology, but more of a social relationship, a way of being and relating.ā It implies nonhierarchical relationships, direct democracy, anti-authoritarian structure and āa break with vertical ways of organizing and relating, but a break that is also an opening.ā
Horizontalidad spread through Argentina after the largely IMF-induced economic crisis hit the country in 2001. The movement spurred autonomous assemblies, factory occupations, experiments in autogestiĆ³n and the development of hundreds of workplace democracies, including worker-run newspapers and media cooperatives communicating the benefits of collective ownership and participatory (typically consensus-based) decisionmaking.
David Graeber, an anthropologist who helped organize the Occupy Wall Street movement, called the prefigurative politics in Argentina āThe Buenos Aires Strategy.ā In his new book, The Democracy Project, he suggests the popular modus operandi during and after the 2001 crisis was ānot to engage directly with the political establishment at all, but rather, to strip it of all legitimacy,ā adding that, āThis might be called the Argentina model, or delegitimation approach, and it seems to be more or less whatās happening at the time of writing in Greece.ā
Indeed, workers at Vio.Me drew inspiration from Argentina. They learned from, adopted and adapted what they learned from Argentine workers. Specifically, they gained insight from the experience of the ZanĆ³n ceramics factory (renamed FaSinPat for FĆ”brica sin Patrones, or Factory Without a Boss).
Workers in Thessaloniki stress that their primary motivation in recuperating the Vio.Me factory was, as they said, āto keep us and our families alive,ā but at the same time they emphasize the practical and humanistic importance of transnational solidarity given the realities of transnational corporate hegemony.
ā[W]e are sure that if we stay alone we wonāt stand, and the capitalism will āswallowā us,ā they said. āItās between that and the building of a network of occupied-factories in different countries, agricultural co-operatives where we will be able to support each other.ā
Many governments resist alternatives to capitalist ownership that seriously attempt to democratize wealth, but certain policy changes have proven possible elsewhere and could aid in finding the kind of legal solutions workers in Greece seek.
Italy, which leads the world with over 800,000 workers in the cooperative sector, has favorable public policy codified in its constitution, recognizing āthe social function of co-operation with mutual character and without private speculation purposes.ā Likewise, recent legislation in Brazil breaks new ground in ensuring rights of worker cooperatives. The Working World, a nonprofit of self-described āventure capitalists with a radical social mission,ā helped Nicaraguan co-ops secure government grants. The organization also lent support to Vio.Me.
Workers at Vio.Me would appreciate any positive changes in public policy that can be obtained. Help for policies promoting autogestiĆ³n over austerity could come from the popular left coalition, Syriza, or possibly from extra-parliamentary forces like the Front of Solidarity and Overthrow (MAA), a radical left party in Greece.
Either way, the Greek workers intend to recuperate even more businesses that are being shuttered.
āWe believe that unemployment can be solved this way,ā the workers say. āIt serves a way out of the workerās dead end, because now we are workers with no job, no money, no dignity.ā
Their mission points to lifesaving escapes from future economic hardships, they add. The process affects individuals, institutions and society writ large.
āThe whole struggle has changed us collectively and in total,ā said Theodoros Karyotis, a spokesperson for the Vio.Me Solidarity Initiative. āWe have become more active and we are more willing to take part in many things and procedures.ā
He explained how everyone at Vio.Me appears more interested in implementable ideas āabout democracy, about the collectivity.ā
Dialectically speaking, that personal transformation is essential to far-reaching social transformation, as the two are interdependent parts of a totality, much like the different individuals who comprise autonomous horizontal collectives. Innovative cooperative establishments that link up across borders and commit to practicing participatory democracy can potentially alter both individual and collective consciousness.
āIn that way the economy model will start to change along with peopleās awareness,ā they said. āThat may be the start of the whole societyās change.ā
The workers want to impress upon the public that the time is now to start making things happen. For those interested in embarking with others on a self-management venture, āwe will stand by you,ā they say.
āWe will surely win, all together!ā
The author would like to thank Anastasia at the Thessaloniki Solidarity Initiative for translating interview questions. He also thanks all of the workers at Vio.Me and everyone who supports them.
Join us in defending the truth before itās too late
The future of journalism is uncertain, and the consequences of losing it are too grave to ignore. To ensure Truthout remains fearless, tough, and 100 percent independent, we need to raise $28,000 in the next 3 days. Every dollar raised goes directly toward the costs of producing news you can trust.
Please give what you can ā because by supporting us with a tax-deductible donation, youāre not just preserving a source of news, youāre helping to safeguard whatās left of our democracy.