Skip to content Skip to footer

“Zero Troops” in Afghanistan by 9/11 Anniversary, Biden White House Says

It’s unclear if the troop withdrawal being discussed includes hundreds of special ops forces that remain in the country.

U.S. Army soldiers retrieve their duffel bags after returning home from a nine-month deployment to Afghanistan on December 10, 2020, at Fort Drum, New York.

President Joe Biden is expected to announce on Wednesday the withdrawal of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, bringing to an end almost 20 years of U.S. occupation in the country, albeit with some potential caveats.

Sources with knowledge of the plan for the withdrawal, speaking anonymously to The Washington Post, said Biden’s goal is to begin a phased withdrawal of the 2,500 remaining troops in Afghanistan over the course of the next few months. By September 11, 2021 — the 20th anniversary of the attacks in New York, Washington D.C. and Pennsylvania that led to former President George W. Bush starting the war in Afghanistan in the first place — there will purportedly be “zero troops” from the United States in that country.

Left unclear, however, is whether troop withdrawal will include removing hundreds of special operations forces that are in the country as well, which aren’t part of the official count of troop presence there. Biden has, in the past, indicated a preference for keeping special forces in the region, while also using surveillance and drone attacks to keep a U.S. military presence in Afghanistan.

The goal to remove U.S. troops from the country also goes beyond a deal negotiated between the Trump White House and the Taliban, which promised to have the troops out by May 1. Biden acknowledged last month that that promise would likely go unfulfilled, but in the same breath said that a military withdrawal would happen soon.

“We are not staying for a long time. We will leave,” Biden said in March. “The question is when we leave … it’s going to be hard to meet the May 1 deadline just in terms of tactical reasons.”

By making a promise to leave by September 11, the Biden administration hopes to honor the spirit, if not the letter, of the previously negotiated withdrawal plans.

“If we break the May 1st deadline negotiated by the previous administration with no clear plan to exit, we will be back at war with the Taliban, and that was not something President Biden believed was in the national interest,” a source familiar with the plan told the Post.

Failure to withdraw sooner wasn’t necessarily entirely Biden’s fault. Former President Donald Trump campaigned in 2016 on leaving Afghanistan. In 2020, his White House negotiated a plan to do so with the Taliban, on the condition that the group would sever its remaining ties with al-Qaeda in the region. But when Biden came into office, there were no logistics set in place to begin the withdrawal of troops within the May 1 timeframe that Trump had promised.

More than 2,000 U.S. troops, and at least 100,000 Afghan civilians, have died in the 20 years that the U.S. has occupied the country. The war has also cost more than a trillion dollars in spending.

Military operations have continued throughout that entire time — in 2019 alone, the U.S. dropped more than 7,000 bombs and other munitions in the country.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.