A Wisconsin appeals court on Tuesday put on hold a purge of approximately 200,000 voters from the state voter rolls. The court proceedings have been complicated, and how it will end is unclear, but this purge is a bad idea regardless of how the courts come down on its legality.
The purge might happen in 2020 (rather than in 2021, as planned by the Wisconsin Election Commission) because an activist group sued state election administrators, alleging they were not purging voters aggressively enough. This bullying of election administrators into purging is an alarming trend. From 2008 to 2018, more than half of all federal lawsuits on purges brought by private activists were actions to pressure states into purging more voters from the rolls. In 2017 and 2019, anti-voter activists encouraged extreme purge practices by sending a series of letters to local election officials across the country, threatening legal action if the jurisdictions did not undertake more aggressive purges. In some places — including California, Wisconsin, and Detroit — the letters were followed by lawsuits.
The Wisconsin purge controversy is happening in an already highly tense environment, as Wisconsin’s 2016 presidential vote was decided by fewer than 23,000 votes. The state passed a strict photo ID law in 2011 and cut back early voting opportunities in 2011 and again in 2014.
Meanwhile, other voter purge controversies have been happening across the country. In December, Georgia purged over 300,000 voters from its rolls. Last fall, Ohio was poised to purge 235,000 people from its rolls before it discovered that about 20 percent of the voters on the list shouldn’t have been on it at all. Earlier in 2019, Texas sought to purge nearly 100,000 voters who were purportedly noncitizens, but a federal court stopped the purge from going forward because the state was relying on faulty data.
As courts in Wisconsin deliberate on the lawfulness of a purge there, there’s no question that, in most states, this kind of purge would violate federal voting protections in the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). However, Wisconsin is exempt from that law because the state allows people to register and vote on Election Day.
Under the NVRA, a state may not remove a voter for failing to respond to a notice regarding a potential change of address until two federal elections have passed. In addition, the NVRA prohibits a systematic purge within 90 days of a federal election. These provisions ensure that voters have sufficient time to fix any mistakes by election administrators before their registrations are cancelled. If the purge goes forward in Wisconsin, there will be no two-cycle waiting period and the purge will occur with less than 90 days before the Democratic presidential primary.
The logic behind Wisconsin’s exemption is that Election Day registration mitigates some of the concerns that arise from sloppy purges because even a wrongfully-purged voter can re-register on Election Day and cast a ballot that will count. But Election Day registration in Wisconsin has its limits as a corrective tool.
To begin with, Election Day registration only works if voters know that it’s Election Day. But voters removed from the rolls don’t get notices about upcoming votes, polling place locations, and the races and issues on the ballot. And Election Day registrants not only must have the required photo ID, they must also present proof of residence in Wisconsin. That’s asking a lot of a voter who never should have been removed from the rolls to begin with.
Wisconsin election administrators were justifiably cautious. Large scale purges are always risky because of the sheer numbers of records involved. Additionally, the third-party information used to do these systematic purges, which does not come directly from a voter, will inevitably include errors. In fact, the data source used to flag the voters for this particular purge has been used before in Wisconsin, and there were some undeniable issues in accuracy.
No one is disputing that voter rolls should be up-to-date and accurate, but largescale voter purges based on unreliable data too close to an election are going to make voters rightfully concerned. Across the country, election administrators should be doing more to restore voter confidence. A massive and rushed purge in Wisconsin would do just the opposite.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy