Wisconsin’s effort to open the state to predatory lenders using American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) legislation has paid dividends for the ALEC legislators behind it.
In May of 2011, Rep. Robin Vos, the ALEC State Chair in Wisconsin and head of the powerful Joint Finance Committee, rolled a provision into the 2011-2012 budget bill resembling ALEC model legislation and that legalized auto title loans. Democrats voted against the provision, but it ultimately passed the Republican-led Finance Committee and state legislature.
Officials with Georgia-based title loan company LoanMax then gave over $24,000 in campaign contributions to Republican Assembly candidates, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel’s Dan Bice reported this week.
LoanMax is a member of the ALEC Commerce, Insurance, and Economic Development Task Force and is a pioneer in the car title loan business.
Predatory Lending Practices “Trap Borrowers in a Cycle of Debt”
Auto title loans are a form of high-interest, short-term lending that many states have recognized as unfair and predatory to low-income consumers. Research from the Consumer Federation of America and the Center for Responsible Lending indicates that “the typical car title loan has a triple-digit annual interest rate, requires repayment within one month, and is made for much less than the value of the car,” with many borrowers eventually paying fees well in excess of the amount originally borrowed.
Consumer groups have opposed this type of lending not only because the high interest rates and short-term repayment period can trap consumers in a cycle of debt, but also because they risk losing their cars, which they often need to get to work.
The ALEC “Title Pledge Act” has the same impact as Rep. Vos’ budget amendment. It advances the interest of lending companies by giving short-term, 30-day renewable loans with very high interest rates and backed by a borrower’s car title. The spiraling interest payments are very difficult for people in tough financial circumstances to keep up with, but the bill provides few consumer protections, for example failing to include a private right of action with strong remedies, and requiring that all claims be brought within one year. This provides little deterrence for predatory lenders, and because the budgets of regulatory agencies are limited, the state cannot adequately protect against abuses.
Former Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle had outlawed title loans using a veto in 2010 but Rep. Vos’ budget motion opened the state to the practice.
“It’s fair to say that if Democrats had been in control, might they have done things that hurt their (title loan) business? Probably,” Vos told the Journal Sentinel. As for the title loan industry’s generous campaign contributions to Republicans, Vos said, “It makes sense to buy — you know — to have insurance.”
Consumer Groups Gave Warnings About Title Pledge Industry
The Consumer Federation of America, U.S. PIRG, and the Center for Responsible Lending sent a letter to ALEC in November 2005 warning that title pledge loans “trap borrowers in a cycle of debt” and noting that the ALEC model bill failed to include adequate consumer protections.
The letter also pointed out the distorting influence of “generous campaign contributions” from the title pledge industry.
“These people have the conscience of a pit viper,” state Senator Bob Jauch told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
Jauch, a Democrat who voted against the title pledge proposal, said there’s no doubt LoanMax officials are giving to Republicans as a reward for last year’s legislative action — or, as Rep. Vos put it, as “insurance” to protect their industry. “There is no moral basis for these contributions,” Jauch said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.