Skip to content Skip to footer

Will Arkansas Rush Executions Because Its Lethal Injection Drugs Are Expiring?

This absurd situation only highlights the injustice of the death penalty.

Last year, Arkansas shocked the world with a “conveyor belt” of executions rushed through for a reason that almost exceeds belief: The state was worried that its execution drugs were expiring and it wouldn’t be able to get more. Now, some of those who managed to get stays are wondering if their time is up as well, as another expiration deadline looms.

This absurd situation only highlights the injustice of the death penalty.

According to the BBC, Arkansas uses a combination of three drugs in its execution protocol: the sedative Midazolam, vecuronium bromide, which causes muscle paralysis and respiratory failure, and potassium chloride to stop the heart. Like other states, Arkansas is struggling to secure a supply of these medications – especially because some drug companies are refusing to sell to the prison system and directing their distributors to similarly deny access to drugs that could be used in executions. Some states have built up stockpiles of medications or used compounding pharmacies to manufacture drugs.

Arkansas opted to built up a collection of drugs, but now, they’re about to expire — and that will leave the state with the option of discarding the drugs, or rushing to put them to use. Since the medication may be challenging to replace, some death row inmates fear the execution process may speed up.

Three inmates in particular, all of whom received stays last year, are worried about their fate: Bruce Ward, Jack Greene and Don Davis. The three are incarcerated for murders that took place in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and have been winding their way through the appeals process for decades. Ward is severely mentally ill, Greene’s mental competence has been called into question and Davis is an abuse survivor with ADHD and substance abuse issues. By some grounds, the three men may be ineligible for execution on the basis of their mental conditions.

On March 1, the state’s supply of vecuronium bromide — obtained, Pfizer says, under questionable circumstances — will expire, and in the coming months, other execution drugs will expire as well. This raises concerns that the state may consider another “conveyor belt of death,” lining up prisoners with pending executions and moving them swiftly through the system. Even if the state follows procedural protocols, hastening these deaths could leave multiple opportunities for injustice.

That’s especially worrisome since botched executions are a known issue, and drugs near expiry, coming from questionable sources, could pose an increased risk of error. Kenneth Williams, one of the men executed in 2017, was seen having “convulsions.”

Between watching medical staff fumble for veins and witnessing prisoners experience unexpected reactions to these medications, witnesses aren’t necessarily assured a view of the “peaceful” death implied by proponents of the lethal injection. Some prisoners experience agony that can last for hours.

Currently, Arkansas has no executions scheduled, but those counting down the clock are keeping a close eye on the state. Is Arkansas on the verge of pushing through another mass execution because it can’t obtain the drugs it needs to do its dirty work?

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.