The Slate commentator Matthew Yglesias recently noted an uptick in warnings from Very Serious People that China might lose confidence in America and start dumping our bonds. In an article published earlier this month, he focuses on China’s motives, which is useful.
But the crucial point, which Mr. Yglesias touches on only briefly at the end, is that whatever China’s motives, the Chinese wouldn’t hurt us if they dumped our bonds – in fact, it would probably be good for the United States.
But, you say, wouldn’t that send interest rates up and depress the American economy? I’ve been writing about this issue a lot in various guises, and have yet to see any coherent explanation of how it’s supposed to work. Think about it: China’s selling American bonds wouldn’t drive up short-term interest rates, which are set by the Federal Reserve.
It’s not clear why it would drive up long-term rates, either, since these mainly reflect expected short-term rates. And even if Chinese sales somehow put a squeeze on longer maturities, the Fed could just engage in more quantitative easing and buy up those bonds. It’s true that such actions could possibly depress the value of the dollar. But that would be good for America!
Think about Abenomics in Japan: Its biggest success so far has been to drive down the value of the yen, which has helped Japanese exporters.
But Greece, you say. Well, Greece doesn’t have its own currency or monetary policy; capital flight there led to a decline in the money supply, which wouldn’t happen in the United States.
The persistence of scaremongering about Chinese confidence is a remarkable thing: It continues to be what Very Serious People say, even though it literally makes no sense at all. As the economist Dean Baker once put it, China has an empty water pistol pointed at our head.
Lies, Damned Lies
The other day, the Fox News commentator Sean Hannity featured on his show some Real Americans telling tales of how they have been hurt by the Affordable Care Act. So Eric Stern, who used to work for Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, had a bright idea: He actually called Mr. Hannity’s guests, to get the details. Sure enough, according to an article that Mr. Stern wrote for Salon, the businessman who claimed that Obamacare was driving up his costs, forcing him to lay off workers, only has four employees – meaning that Obamacare has no effect whatsoever on his business.
The two families complaining about soaring premiums haven’t actually checked out what’s on offer, and Mr. Stern estimates that they would in fact see major savings. You have to wonder about the mindset of people who go on national television to complain about how they’re suffering, based on nothing but what they think they’ve heard somewhere. You might also wonder what kind of alleged news show features such people without checking on their bona fides. But then again, consider the network.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.