Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
We are a mere few days from the Iowa caucus on February 1, the first in the nation endorsement contest for both the Republican and Democratic presidential nominees. A lot has changed since the summer, when everyone assumed Donald Trump would quickly flame out and that Bernie Sanders was just running a vanity campaign in order to move Hillary Clinton further to the left. Instead of a mostly settled Democratic race and a battle royale in the GOP, we have a head to head fight in the GOP and a Democratic race that changes every minute.
When Trump entered the fray in July, no one expected his frontrunner status to last more than a few speeches. Now, he’s not only the person to beat on the Republican side, the party establishment itself seems to be finally ready to deal with his inevitability. If there was any doubt that the party has succumbed to the idea that Trump very well may be the nominee, and must be treated as such, that doubt was dismissed last week when National Review wrote a blistering editorial about why Trump’s campaign must be defeated, stating Trump was “a menace to American conservatism who would take the work of generations and trample it underfoot in behalf of a populism as heedless and crude as the Donald himself.” In response, the Republican National Committee rescinded its invitation to the outlet to help co-host an upcoming GOP debate.
“That soft flapping sound you hear is the Grand Old Party waving the flag of surrender to Trump,” writes the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank. “Party elites – what’s left of the now-derided ‘establishment’ – are acquiescing to the once inconceivable: that a xenophobic and bigoted showman is now the face of the Republican Party and of American conservatism.”
While the establishment may be ready to throw in the towel, Texas Senator Ted Cruz says he’s not going down without a fight. But that fight may be a little less feisty now that Trump has regained his lead over Cruz in Iowa. One factor his campaign may not have been prepared for? An endorsement for Florida Senator Marco Rubio by the state’s biggest paper. Then again, according to conservative pundits, that endorsement may be worse for a GOP candidate than not being recognized at all.
On the Democratic endorsement side, the race couldn’t be any tighter. Iowa is a dead heat for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, with latest polling leaving the two candidates just one point apart – and well within the margin of error. Complicating the ability to see if either candidate has an edge is the fact that many are predicting this could be the biggest caucus in a long time.
“Republican Party of Iowa state chairman Jeff Kaufmann and Iowa Democratic Party chairwoman Andy McGuire talked about the caucuses during taping for this week’s episode of ‘Iowa Press’ on Iowa Public Television,” reports the Iowa Gazette. “Kaufmann said he expects the largest caucus turnout in his party’s history. That expectation is bolstered by a large field of candidates and the potential for a wave of first-time caucusgoers turning out to support candidate Donald Trump.” Democratic leaders believe their caucus will also be large, but likely not as large as the 2008 caucus that gave President Barack Obama his first win.
Who wins Iowa will have a big effect on who the eventual nominee is – at least, it will if you are a Democrat. Traditionally, the Democratic candidate who wins Iowa is far more likely to be the overall nominee, with Iowa failing to predict the eventual winner only a few times in the last half a century. On the other hand, they almost always pick a GOP nominee who fails to win the party endorsement, so maybe Cruz doesn’t have to feel so bad if he fails to win the state after all.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.