Skip to content Skip to footer

Warren Introduces Bill to Levy 15 Percent Minimum Tax on Corporate Profits

The tax would be levied on profits that corporations report to shareholders with the aim of capturing a truer tax rate.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden speak to reporters about a corporate minimum tax plan at the U.S. Capitol on October 26, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

As Democrats run out of options for funding their shrinking reconciliation bill, key senators including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) have introduced a bill that would ensure that large corporations pay a minimum tax rate. This would prevent companies from exploiting the tax system to pay a zero or negative effective tax rate.

The Corporate Profits Minimum Tax would levy a 15 percent minimum tax on profits over $1 billion based on profits that the corporations report to the shareholders, or book profits — rather than profits that corporations report to the government, which they often deflate to dodge higher tax rates. The tax would apply to about 200 companies and could raise hundreds of billions for the government over the next decade, the lawmakers say.

The statutory corporate tax rate of 21 percent, hacked down from 35 percent by Republicans in 2017, wouldn’t be affected by this proposal. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Arizona) has stood staunchly against raising the corporate tax rate, as she enjoys close relationships with conservative lobby groups and corporations.

“Giant corporations have been exploiting tax loopholes for too long, and it’s about time they pay their fair share to help run this country, just like everyone else,” said Warren. “The Corporate Profits Minimum Tax would end corporate double dealing and ensure companies pay something in taxes when they report billions in profits to their shareholders.”

Bill co-introducer Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) emphasized that corporations should play a larger role in funding the government. “In 1965, corporations paid roughly 4 percent of the nation’s GDP in state and federal income tax. Today, that rate is only 1 percent,” King said. “This massive decline has contributed to the nation’s rising debt and threatened basic public sector services Americans rely upon.”

The bill is similar to a proposal that Warren introduced earlier this year, which would create a 7 percent tax on every dollar of profit above $100 million that corporations report to their shareholders. That bill is slightly more expansive and could raise $700 billion over a decade.

This week’s legislation was introduced by Warren and King and Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-Oregon). Wyden is a key figure in the reconciliation bill as he chairs the committee responsible for crafting the tax proposals in the bill. The proposal is cosponsored by Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colorado), Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island).

The proposal is similar to a proposal that the White House has advocated for in recent weeks, as Democrats scramble to find tax proposals that could pay for the reconciliation bill. With Sinema and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) opposing proposals to hike tax rates on corporations and the wealthy — and with Sinema opposed to the extremely popular, crucial revenue-raising proposal to lower prescription drug prices — Democrats find themselves having to propose increasingly obscure ways to raise revenue.

Sinema is surprisingly in favor of the corporate minimum tax. “This proposal represents a commonsense step toward ensuring that highly profitable corporations — which sometimes can avoid the current corporate tax rate — pay a reasonable minimum corporate tax on their profits,” she said in a statement.

Sinema’s statement is ironic considering that her opposition to raising the corporate tax is part of why corporations can avoid paying taxes, since the low rate makes it easier for corporations to push down their effective tax rate. Further, she’s shown little interest in closing loopholes that allow corporations to dodge the statutory tax rate, suggesting that her statement may be disingenuous.

Still, garnering the support of Sinema is huge in today’s politics, since she and Manchin are the Democrats’ biggest roadblocks to passing bills in Congress. The duo has already gotten their way with the reconciliation bill, succeeding in cutting it by nearly half despite objections from progressive lawmakers.

Although no Democrats have objected to the tax proposal, it’s unclear if Manchin supports it. Outlets reported earlier this week that Manchin was generally supportive of the White House’s proposals for a corporate minimum tax and a billionaire tax, but more recent reporting has found that Manchin may not actually be in support of the billionaire tax, which would only levy a tax on the investment incomes of the top 0.0002 percent wealthiest Americans.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.