Skip to content Skip to footer

Vampire Blues: Suckin’ Blood From the Earth

I’m a vampire, babe, suckin’ blood from the earth I’m a vampire, baby, suckin’ blood from the earth. Well, I’m a vampire, babe, sell you 20 barrels worth.

I’m a vampire, babe,
suckin’ blood
from the earth
I’m a vampire, baby,
suckin’ blood
from the earth.
Well, I’m a vampire, babe,
sell you
20 barrels worth.

When Neil Young recorded the anti-Big Oil “Vampire Blues” for his brilliant album On the Beach in the mid-1970s, who could have known that the song would end up even more relevant a quarter century later? Speculation abounds on fan sites that Neil, who is currently on tour, believes the time is right to perform “Vampire Blues” once again, particularly given the ongoing disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

While BP, with the complicity of federal authorities, has been blocking the media from reporting on what is actually happening in the Gulf, startling images from behind the wall of industry and government obfuscation periodically leak out. The still photographs of oiled birds, especially the endangered brown pelicans, are near impossible to view without immediately descending into a very dark, ugly place.

The video posted online showing the oil-coated baby bottlenose dolphin as it lay dying in the arms of a tourist trying to rescue the animal serves as an awful harbinger of the death and destruction taking place that we are not being allowed to witness. One hopes that a sea change is occurring in the continent’s collective consciousness and that the annihilation of our fellow nonhuman inhabitants will no longer be acceptable as part of the cost of doing business in the age of oil.

I’m a black bat, babe,
bangin’ on
your window pane
I’m a black bat, baby,
bangin’ on
your window pane.
Well, I’m a black bat, babe,
I need my high octane.

At the root of the ever-growing mess we are making of the world’s oceans is an economic system that is based upon unlimited growth on a finite planet … which leads us to British Columbia, Canada, where federal and provincial governments, equally obsequious in the face of Big Oil’s demands as their US counterparts, are eager to turn BC’s magnificent teeming-with-life coast into an energy corridor. Enbridge Inc. is pushing hard to construct a twinned pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta to the coast of BC, where Exxon Valdez sized supertankers would ship “the world’s dirtiest oil” to Asian and American markets. Parenthetically, Enbridge is the company responsible for the pipeline break that has just spilled some three million liters of crude oil into Michigan’s Kalamazoo River.

Speaking of the tar sands, a major commotion has erupted in reaction to the launch of the US-based Rethink Alberta campaign, which is urging Americans not to visit the province this summer. BC conservation groups might want to consider taking a page from US environmental NGO’s and adopt a similar campaign asking British Columbians to “rethink” traveling to Alberta in light of the pipeline the Alberta government, the tar sands industry and Calgary headquartered Enbridge are trying to shove down our throats.

In response to the Rethink Alberta controversy, it appears that federal Environment Minister, Jim Prentice, is attempting to make the tar sands a gauge of Canadian patriotism. His assertion that “all Canadians really have an obligation to speak up” in defense of the tar sands is highly disconcerting. There are a whole lot of Canadians who happen to live in British Columbia that have some serious issues with putting the BC coast at risk so that Alberta can reap profits by shipping tar sands crude off shore. Polling suggests a majority of British Columbians want to see our coast remain oil free. Would Prentice judge this significant segment of the BC citizenry to be unpatriotic Canadians?

BP’s Deepwater Horizon debacle has prompted many Canadians to pause and reflect with regard to the industry and government agenda of aggressively pursuing oil development and transport. A delegation of First Nations leaders from coastal BC recently traveled to the Gulf Coast to witness the upheaval firsthand. What they saw only steeled their opposition to the Enbridge proposal as First Nations would be the hardest hit among coastal communities in the event of a catastrophic oil spill on BC’s north coast.

But when it comes to corporate Canada, it’s full speed ahead, even in the face of the “oilpocalypse” to the south. Armed with a $100 million war chest, Enbridge has launched a public relations blitzkrieg to convince Canadians that their “Northern Gateway” pipeline project will accomplish all manner of wondrous things, with the possible exception of a cure for cancer.

Full-page advertisements in newspapers across the country trumpet how Northern Gateway and its attendant oil tanker traffic will solve unemployment, build sustainable communities and even make BC’s rocky north coast safer for all marine traffic. Desperate to find messaging that will resonate with the Canadian public, Enbridge spin doctors have even started to assert that Northern Gateway is at heart an egalitarian crusade to help poor, third world countries by supplanting animal dung with oil for their heating needs.

Good times are comin’,
I hear it everywhere I go
Good times are comin’,
I hear it everywhere I go.
Good times are comin’,
but they sure comin’ slow.

Neil, it’s looking like we’re going to need you to come home to Canada and help us fight the vampires up here too.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.