Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Utah’s Ag Gag Law Is Declared Unconstitutional

A federal judge has ruled Utah’s law making it illegal to film what happens at farms and slaughterhouses unconstitutional.

In a major victory for animals and supporters of free speech, a federal judge has ruled that Utah’s law making it illegal to film what happens at farms and slaughterhouses is unconstitutional.

These laws — which have become known as ag gag laws — are blatant attempts to hide what’s happening on farms and criminalize anyone who attempts to bring the truth to light. They started popping up in the early 1990s, when North Dakota, Kansas and Montana all passed legislation that make it illegal to enter facilities that are closed to the public, or to take photographs, or audio and video recordings.

Since then, attempts to pass similar laws have been tried and defeated in a number of states, but a few have unfortunately succeeded in passing various versions of them.

Utah’s ag gag law was passed in 2012, which made it illegal to record an agricultural operation while trespassing or entering the premises on false pretenses, whether it was an activist, undercover investigator or journalist, and it would apply regardless of whether the issue exposed was animal cruelty, or violations of food safety and other laws.

Soon after the law was passed, Amy Meyer, a resident activist, became the first person in the nation to be prosecuted under one of these laws.

Her crime? Videotaping cruelty to a cow who was unable to walk on its own. The cow was pushed with a bulldozer and treated like trash at the Dale T. Smith and Sons Meat Packing Co. in Draper City. Meyer made the recording with her cell phone from the roadside while she was on public property, yet she was charged with agricultural-operation interference. Her case sparked national attention and outrage, and the charges against her were later dismissed, but the law still stood.

Later that year, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) filed the first lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of ag gag laws against the state, partially on Meyer’s behalf, and now they’re celebrating a major victory.

On July 7, US District Judge Robert Shelby issued a landmark ruling that struck down the law on the grounds that it violates the First Amendment.

“The court’s ruling recognizes what PETA has said all along, which is that Americans have a right to know that workers in the meat industry kick pigs in the face, stomp on chickens and turkeys, and smash piglets’ heads against concrete floors,” said PETA Foundation Director of Animal Law, Jared Goodman. “PETA will continue to support the constitutional right of whistleblowers to serve the public and animals by exposing the horrific cruelty that occurs behind the scenes in this industry.”

Investigations exposing the reality of animal agriculture have led to changes in laws, convictions for cruelty and have opened the public’s eyes to what happens behind closed doors. Without them, or free access to the truth, our ability to make informed decisions or generate a dialogue about the industry is stripped away.

The win in Utah follows another victory in Idaho, where the US District Court ruled the state’s ag gag law violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments in 2015, and it will hopefully be followed by more.

“These unconstitutional laws will fall like dominos,” said Stephen Wells, executive director of the ALDF. “Ag-Gag laws are flagrant attempts to hide animal cruelty from the American people, and they unfairly target activists trying to serve the public’s interest.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy