Beirut — Citing increased threats to American citizens as the United States debates military action in Syria, the Obama administration on Friday ordered nonessential personnel out of its embassy in neighboring Lebanon.
The State Department also said it would allow nonessential staff and their families to leave other key regional diplomatic outposts in Turkey and Iraq.
As the Syrian civil wars rages on, violence has been growing steadily in Lebanon between supporters and opponents of the insurgency against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government. Car bombings in the past month have killed nearly 100 people in Lebanon, and kidnappings, for both political and economic reasons, became commonplace in the last year.
The State Department’s statement attributed the decision to let some diplomats leave and warn other Americans to “an abundance of caution,” but three different U.S. government officials have warned Americans recently of a direct and specific threat to U.S. citizens working and living in Lebanon from Syria’s ally Iran if the Obama administration takes military action against Syria for an alleged chemical-weapons attack on a rebel-held Damascus suburb last month.
The three government officials, who spoke to different Americans over 10 days, described a specific kidnapping threat against Americans living in Lebanon. One said the information about the threat came from intercepts of Iranian officials passing on orders to Iran’s numerous proxies and allies in Lebanon’s fractious political scene.
One of the officials also reported a threat against the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. That threat was attributed to an Iranian militia that was ordered to attack the embassy or other diplomatic targets if strikes against Syria took place.
Lebanon and Iraq are considered particularly vulnerable to Iranian and Syrian covert operations because of their porous borders with Syria, as well as an abundance of battle-tested allies in place to conduct such missions.
Two Turkish airline pilots were kidnapped from a busy street in Beirut last month in retaliation for the continued imprisonment by Syrian rebels of Lebanese nationals who are accused of helping the Syrian regime battle the insurgents. Turkey had cut off diplomatic ties with the Assad regime and expressed support for the opposition.
A number of Persian Gulf countries – including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait – either have barred or discouraged travel to Lebanon, citing those governments’ support for the rebels.
Although the Lebanese Shiite Muslim militant group Hezbollah is the largest and best-funded Iranian ally in the world – not to mention one of the world’s most effective nongovernmental political-military groups – it’s hardly the only option in Lebanon, where a slew of Iranian- and Syrian-funded militant groups openly keep headquarters and training bases without interference from Lebanon’s weak and ineffective central government.
A Hezbollah military commander denied that his group would consider any sort of action against American civilians, regardless of their government’s involvement in Syria. While one U.S. government official cited the group’s history of taking hostages on behalf of Iran in the 1980s as a major concern, the Hezbollah commander said his group had learned that such moves were counterproductive.
“The hostages from the 1980s have hurt us as a resistance project more than any Israeli bomb,” he said, speaking only on the condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to talk to a reporter. “The idea we would kidnap Americans today in Beirut is ridiculous. We even have a religious ruling that says no targeting civilians.”
When he was asked whether Hezbollah’s allies among more secular groups in Lebanon would follow such religious edicts, he demurred.
One area of concern to Western intelligence officials in Lebanon – which hosts a U.N. peacekeeping force made up of the citizens of a variety of countries, including France, which has called for strikes – remains Hezbollah members who are suspected of working directly for Tehran, possibly without notifying their Hezbollah superiors.
The Special Tribunal for Lebanon, which is investigating the 2005 murder of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in a car bombing that took 20 other lives, has indicted several members of Hezbollah in the bombing, but it’s also described a semiautonomous unit of Lebanese Shiites within the group who have long-standing ties to Iranian intelligence. Of particular concern to intelligence agents watching over Westerners in Lebanon is Hezbollah commander Mustafa Badreddine, who served a prison sentence in Kuwait for the 1983 bombing of several foreign embassies in Kuwait and is under indictment by the special tribunal.
“Hezbollah doesn’t need to kidnap anyone,” said one Western intelligence official working in Beirut, who asked to remain anonymous because of the sensitivity of the topic. “Mustafa can handle anything Iran wants without it becoming a big deal, and that doesn’t count the groups that are even more obscure. So I have no doubt (Hezbollah chief Hassan) Nasrallah can say his group wasn’t involved if something does happen. He could even mean it.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.