The U.S. is lobbying fellow UN Security Council members to vote against an upcoming resolution that would recognize Palestinian statehood, leaked documents obtained by The Intercept show, severely undercutting the White House’s stated position of supporting a two-state solution.
The State Department cables reportedly show that U.S. officials are pressuring fellow Security Council members like Malta, the president of the council this month, France, Japan and Korea to quash a request from Palestinians to be admitted as a full member of the UN, with officials from Ecuador acting as key figures in the lobbying effort.
The U.S. is undergoing a lobbying campaign in order to avoid vetoing the resolution, The Intercept reports, with officials likely highly aware of the global outrage the U.S. has caused with its multiple standalone vetoes of ceasefire resolutions that have been brought in front of the Security Council in past months.
The UN Security Council is slated to vote on Friday on the request from the Palestinian Authority, which currently controls parts of the West Bank, to vote on the application for full membership that has been pending since 2011 due to delays and a lack of consensus from the Security Council. This step would be crucial to a two-state solution, which President Joe Biden has insisted that he supports, or another outcome allowing for Palestinian self-determination, but the U.S. is once again looking to intervene on behalf of Israel and against Palestinian rights in UN matters.
If the Security Council doesn’t approve the resolution, then it would make any vote in the UN General Assembly toothless, International Crisis Group director on UN Richard Gowan told The Intercept.
“Like it or not, a General Assembly vote on this issue is of political rather than legal weight,” Gowan said. “The Assembly can only accept a new state ‘on the recommendation’ of the Security Council.”
The cables, which The Intercept’s Ken Klippenstein posted in full on his Substack newsletter, argue that recognizing the Palestinian state would be detrimental to the establishment of Palestinian statehood because it would “heighten tensions” between Palestine, its supposed Arab allies, and Israel.
“It remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors. We believe this approach can tangibly advance Palestinian goals in a meaningful and enduring way,” the cable says.
“We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of ‘Palestine’ as a UN member state, should a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks,” it goes on.
This approach essentially denies that Palestinian representatives could, themselves, ascertain the best path forward for the Palestinian people, while also denying their ability to pursue that pathway.
The cables also lay bare the Biden administration’s efforts to oppose moves that could help advance a two-state solution — which, despite his claims otherwise, he has acted at nearly every turn to oppose.
Incidentally, also opposed to the recognition of a Palestinian state are Israeli officials. Top figures in the Israeli government, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have repeatedly said as such. In January, for instance, Netanyahu said that part of the goal of Israel’s genocide of Gaza was to block any future possibility of the establishment of a Palestinian state.
“In any future arrangement … Israel needs security control over all territory west of the Jordan” river, he said, as translated into English. “This collides with the idea of sovereignty [for Palestinians]. What can you do? This truth I tell to our American friends, and I put the brakes on the attempt to coerce us to a reality that would endanger the state of Israel.”
Truthout also reported this week that it is likely the administration’s internal policy to refuse to recognize the Palestinian state. Under Barack Obama, staff were told not to open correspondence that referenced the “State of Palestine,” or even correspondence with Palestinian officials that includes the Palestinian national emblem, a former State Department official told Truthout. The former official said that is likely still the policy today.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.