Skip to content Skip to footer

US Interior Department Compelled to Reveal Extent of Fracking in Gulf of Mexico

The extent of Gulf fracking is currently unknown and environmentalists say it poses a serious threat to coastal communities and marine life.

Offshore oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico. Fracking techniques were used at 115 wells in the Gulf during 2013, but the extent of offshore fracking remains unknown. (Photo: Jonathan Henderson/Gulf Restoration Network)

Part of the Series

The US Department of the Interior must reveal records on the use of fracking technology in the Gulf of Mexico under a legal settlement with an environmental group filed in federal court on June 1.

The settlement requires the two agencies that regulate offshore oil and gas production in federal waters to release documents on fracking in the Gulf over a nine-month period, beginning in July. The Center for Biological Diversity originally requested the records more than eight months ago under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Once released, the records will also help satisfy a separate FOIA request for Gulf fracking permits filed by Truthout in November 2014.

“Offshore fracking has been shrouded in secrecy, but this settlement will finally force the government to tell us where oil companies are using this toxic technique,” said Kristen Monsell, a Center attorney. “Fracking pollution is a huge threat to marine animals, and the high pressures used to frack offshore wells increase the risk of another devastating oil spill.”

In 2014, regulators released an incomplete list of 115 wells in the Gulf of Mexico where a fracking technology known as “frack packing” was deployed during 2013, but the full extent of offshore fracking is currently unknown. Frack packing is more established and typically smaller in scale than the large, horizontal operations that have ignited a national controversy onshore, but the oil industry and regulators have indicated that such unconventional technology is deployed in the Gulf.

Industry officials have also said they plan to increase the use of fracking techniques to exploit wells in deep Gulf waters, and with more than 4,000 platforms in the region, the Center claims that the scope offshore fracking could be “staggering.”

Offshore fracking involves forcing water and chemicals at high pressure under the sea floor to fracture rocks and release oil and gas from deposits and existing wells with dwindling reserves.

Oil and gas companies are allowed to dump fracking chemicals mixed with wastewater overboard at offshore platforms, but the government does not report how much fracking chemicals are being dumped into the Gulf because it is not tracking such discharges, according to the Center. Pollution permits for Gulf oil drillers do not cover the myriad of chemicals often involved in fracking.

The Center filed its original request in October and sued the two regulatory agencies in January for failing to issue a timely response. The original request asked for documents going back to 1990, which the regulators argued would take more than 20 years to dig up. The Center agreed to narrow the scope of its request to records produced between 2010 and October 2014 as part of the settlement.

Truthout filed a much narrower FOIA request for recent Gulf fracking permits and permit applications in November, and the Center has criticized the government for dragging its feet in responding to both requests.

“It seems like offshore fracking activities have been kept secret, and it makes one wonder what the agencies are trying to hide; perhaps it is just their own failure to adequately regulate the oil industry,” Center attorney Miyoko Sakashita told Truthout in April.

In response to Truthout’s request, regulators said that they do not keep a list of permits that include fracking operations, and while oil and gas companies may submit information on fracking when applying to complete operations at a well, there are “no designated fields on any of our forms specifically for hydraulic fracturing information.”

The regulators also said that federal law allows them to keep permits and applications under wraps for 90 days after oil or gas starts flowing from a well, or two years if the well does not go into production, presumably to protect proprietary business information.

Earlier this year, the Center and a Santa Barbara-based environmental group filed separate lawsuits against the federal government for allegedly approving fracking operations in the Santa Barbara Channel without reviewing the potential impacts fracking could have on marine life and coastal communities. A Truthout investigation brought widespread attention to fracking operations off the California coast in 2013.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy