The University of Michigan (U-M) Faculty Senate Assembly passed a measure this week calling on university leadership to divest from companies that invest in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
“Congratulations to all of the hardworking faculty members at the University of Michigan who made this historic victory possible,” National Students for Justice for Palestine (SJP) said on social media. “We hope this serves as precedent for future faculty-led divestment initiatives on university campuses across Turtle Island.”
The resolution asserts that the number of civilian casualties in Gaza surpasses the average observed in all other global conflicts of the 21st century, and that Israeli forces have killed more than 1 in every 200 people residing in Gaza since October 7, 2023.
The measure also highlights Amnesty International’s discovery that munitions originating from the United States were employed in at least two confirmed Israeli airstrikes in Gaza, killing 43 civilians. Amnesty International, along with 15 other human rights organizations, has demanded that the U.S. State Department suspend all military weaponry transfers to Israel until it conducts an investigation into whether U.S. weapons have been used in human rights violations.
“All states have the obligation to prevent atrocity crimes and promote adherence to norms that protect civilians. The international community is long overdue to live up to these commitments,” the human rights coalition said in a statement.
Additionally, Human Rights Watch has determined that the United States could be implicated in war crimes should it persist in furnishing weapons and diplomatic support for Israel’s ongoing actions in Gaza.
Limited information is available regarding the university’s investments in companies associated with Israel’s genocide. Despite a Faculty Senate assembly’s inquiry in November seeking details on the university’s investments, there has been no response from university administrators. Moreover, the university has rejected multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests related to these investments.
However, such divestment measures are not unprecedented in the university’s history. For example, after years of student activism, the Board of Regents in 1983 agreed to divest 90 percent of its holdings from companies doing business with apartheid South Africa.
During this assembly, U-M faculty also passed a resolution demanding that the university protect student free speech amid nationwide crackdowns on student protests. The measure expresses disapproval in recent unjustified interference with students’ free speech and demands that university leadership “protect and encourage the practice of deliberative democracy within the student community.”
Among other instances of suppression, the university canceled votes last fall on two Central Student Government (CSG) ballot initiatives addressing the university’s position on Israel’s genocidal military campaign in Gaza.
“The cancellation of these votes sends an alarming message, in my view, about free speech at this university,” said Derek Peterson, U-M history and African Studies professor and sponsor of the free speech resolution. “If students engage in speech which the University deems inappropriate or counterproductive, then the University leadership thinks itself empowered to suppress or censor that speech. This is a dangerous move.”
U-M students have consistently organized for justice in Palestine and showed up to support faculty resolutions. In fact, the TAHRIR, a coalition of 60+ student organizations united for Palestinian liberation, organized a silent protest at the Senate Assembly meeting in support of the measures.
“Our peers are inside flooding the room to send our message on our behalf here today at this specific faculty senate,” Zaynab Elkolaly, Students Allied for Freedom and Equality (SAFE) director of activism, told The Michigan Daily. “(It) has a huge pull on administration and an affirmation that they’re calling for divestment would be (a) huge benefit to the cause.”
The passage of these measures by the U-M Faculty Senate Assembly reflects a growing movement among faculty members, spurred by student advocacy, to call for universities to divest from companies that benefit from the Gaza genocide. In December, 60 faculty members at Amherst College sent a letter to the college’s president and members of the board of trustees demanding that the university divest from companies profiting from the “ongoing Israeli military operations that are laying Gazan life and society to waste.” Faculty at Princeton University, Brown University and Harvard University have also called on their universities to cut ties with Israeli companies and U.S. corporations selling weapons to Israel.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.