Universities on both sides of the Atlantic have taken steps to curtail, if not to outright ban, students from protesting. As of early December, the University of London has banned student protests for six months after two days of unrest that led to 41 arrests. In New York City, two universities closed the semester by issuing restrictions for how and where students can protest as well as, in some cases, limiting how much faculty can participate in protests during working hours.
Students in London have been protesting over rising university fees, cuts to worker benefits and a growing trend of privatization in higher education. Protests including a sit-in on December 5 had been held over alleged police brutality towards demonstrators as captured in video footage. The police contend that they had received “no official complaints” about officers’ behavior but at least one onlooker commented that “it all sort of reached a head when they started kettling people” and that the police were “almost just looking for a fight.”
Among those arrested was Oscar Webb, the editor of the London Student newspaper; he had been covering the protests and has been supported by the National Union of Journalists.
University of London administrators are calling the six-month ban on student protests a “last straw” to curb what it has been referring to as “a campaign of aggression and intimidation” during which staff had been “threatened, abused and in some cases injured” and, in particular, “senior members of the university staff, including the Vice-Chancellor, [were] prevented from leaving their offices.” Students have been informed that they “have no right to conduct a ‘sit-in’ or take possession of any areas of the campus” as there has been a “serious incursion upon university property and a serious interference with liberty and freedom of senior university personnel.”
The restrictions on student protests at Cooper Union and City College in New York City occur at the end of a year in which students occupied, and shut down, campus buildings. Students at Cooper Union, a privately funded institution in the East Village of Manhattan, occupied President Jamshed Bharucha’s office for months, outraged over a new tuition policy. A year later, university administrators have presented them with a new “code of conduct” that forbids the “deliberate or knowing disruption of the free flow of pedestrian traffic on Cooper Union premises” as well as “behavior that disturbs the peace, academic study or sleep of others on or off campus.” Any communication that “disrupts or interferes with the orderly operation of the Cooper Union” is discussed in a section on bullying and intimidation.
City College is a part of the City University of New York (CUNY), which has proposed its own set of policies about “expressive activity.” As the New York Times details, a draft issued in June says that “free speech and assembly [are] to be subject to the needs for public order”; restricts “gatherings and the distribution of leaflets to approved areas and times”; requires sponsors of planned protests with as few as 25 students to receive the college’s approval at least 24 hours in advance; and forbids faculty members from “taking part in protests during working hours.” College officials have also reserved the right to “seek the immediate intervention of public safety officers or external law enforcement” in the event of protests that pose “an immediate threat to persons or property.”
Not surprisingly, students (and faculty) at both Cooper Union and City College have responded with “withering notice.” “If CUNY is to be an intellectually vibrant university, it must recognize that ‘expressive activity’ is a vital part of campus life, not a danger to be confined to narrow limits,” says Barbara Bowen, the president of the union that represents CUNY’s faculty and staff.
In an op-ed about British authorities’ response to the student protests, activist Tony Gosling writes that Prime Minister David Cameron is doing nothing less than trying to gag student dissent. While he has been in office, “Britain’s centers of learning are deteriorating from colleges where young people are educated into loathsome institutions where they are told what to think.”
At New York’s Columbia University, protest is recognized as a valid form of expression. Based on the new bans and restrictions on student protests, the administrations of the University of London, Cooper Union and City College (and Cameron himself) are turning universities into the “new battleground for free speech.” With a new semester starting soon, they should be prepared for quite a few more lessons not only from faculty but from students about why, in institutions of higher learning, freedom of expression and freedom of speech are and will be protected and protested over.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.