Concerns over faculty pay, benefits and students’ classes have propelled a union organizing drive at the private Los Angeles Film School, where management is not pleased that a majority of staff want to join the California Federation of Teachers (CFT), AFL-CIO.
Some faculty members contacted the CFT on February 1, said Tema L. Staig, who teaches at the Los Angeles Film School. A few days later, about 65 percent of the 125-member faculty signed cards to authorize CFT representation, according to Peter Nguyen of the CFT.
Next, the CFT submitted the signed authorization cards to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal agency that oversees union election campaigns. Recently, the CFT finished four days of hearings with the NLRB to determine the parameters of the new proposed collective bargaining unit, Nguyen said.
Allegedly, Los Angeles Film School, management fired one instructor, Brandii Grace, and disciplined another, Celina Reising, for being involved in the union campaign to win collective bargaining representation with the CFT. Management fired Grace one week after promoting from course director of computer game design to chair of the department at the Los Angeles Film School, according to Nguyen and Staig.
The Los Angeles Film School denies the allegations, said Antoine Ibrahim, school spokesman.
Grace and Reising have pending unfair labor practice hearings with the NLRB. Unions that do file ULP documents face a lengthy process in fighting employers’ anti-union tactics, according to top labor scholar Kate Bronfenbrenner of Cornell University.
Meanwhile, Los Angeles Film School management is holding mandatory union education meetings with the faculty, Nguyen, Reising and Staig said.
“The captive-audience meetings are so insulting,” said Staig. “They really have this divide-and-conquer mentality.”
The Los Angeles Film School has hired a variety of companies to lead these meetings with employees on different labor-management issues, said Ibrahim. Asked for the names of the firms involved, he declined to provide them at their request.
IRI Consultants, based in Detroit, Michigan, is one of the firms, said a faculty member at the Los Angeles Film School, who declined to be named. At its web site, IRI Consultants warns employers of the urgency to fight the passage of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which would “give unions a much faster, more effective, less expensive way to add members.”
The EFCA amends the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Currently, the EFCA lacks enough Congressional votes for President Barack Obama to sign it into law.
Diana Derycz-Kessler is the CEO and president of the Los Angeles Film School. “With respect to the California Federation of Teachers, we are doing our best to educate our faculty in regards to their options,” she said in an email statement. “Our hope is to continue having open and direct communication with our faculty.”
“Under the free speech provisions of the NLRA, employers have control of the communication process,” according to Bronfenbrenner. Further, federal labor law bars unions’ access to employees at their workplace.
The NLRB must resolve several questions before setting a date for a union election, according to Nguyen of the CFT, which represents 120,000 teachers and support personnel.
Los Angeles Film School management has retained a law firm that has filed briefs, according to Staig, to delay the union election.
“It’s just another stall tactic,” she said. “We want a vote without intimidation. Nobody should feel afraid to do something that is very American, to vote without being fired or insulted.”
Local labor unions rallied to support the Los Angeles Film School organizing campaign on March 24. At a press conference that day, supporters from Actors Equity to the Directors Guild of America and the American Federation of Musicians turned out to back the pro-union faculty.
The “next logical step” in building support for the workers’ struggle to form a union at the Los Angeles Film School is reaching out to the Los Angeles City Council, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors or the California Legislature, said Nguyen of CFT.
In the meantime, the Los Angeles Film School faculty remain at-will employees. Crucially, they have employment contracts, but their legal status is such that management can release them at any time.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.