According to tweets this week from the House select committee investigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, 2021, by a mob of Trump loyalists, it is considering its next moves over the former president’s refusal to appear before them to give testimony about his actions on that day and in the days leading up to it.
Last month, the committee unanimously voted to subpoena Trump to compel him to speak before them and to provide several documents related to their inquiry. Trump, who initially appeared open to the idea of providing an in-person deposition, sued the committee last week to block the subpoena order.
“Long-held precedent and practice maintain that separation of powers prohibits Congress from compelling a President to testify before it,” Trump attorney David Warrington said in a statement accompanying the lawsuit, glossing over the obvious point that Trump is no longer a sitting president.
The January 6 committee had subpoenaed Trump in mid-October, asking him to appear before the panel by November 14. On that day, the committee’s official Twitter account took note of his absence and the fact that his attorneys had made no efforts to coordinate a plan to have him testify.
“Former President Trump has refused to comply with the Select Committee’s subpoena requiring him to appear for a deposition. His attorneys have made no attempt to negotiate an appearance, and his lawsuit parades out many of the same arguments that courts have rejected repeatedly,” the committee said in one of its tweets.
“Donald Trump orchestrated a scheme to overturn a presidential election and block the transfer of power,” the committee said in an accompanying tweet. “He is obligated to provide answers to the American people.”
“The committee will evaluate next steps in the litigation and regarding the former President’s noncompliance,” the tweet added.
Those “next steps” may include having to decide whether to hold Trump in contempt of Congress — a federal charge that can be levied upon individuals who refuse to respond to questions from congressional committees, and which carries with it a potential penalty of one year of imprisonment.
The committee, if it decides to take that route, would have to vote in favor of doing so before passing the question on to the full House to consider. If the House votes in the affirmative, it then becomes a question for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to decide on.
The committee has forwarded contempt of Congress charges before, relating to its inquiry. The DOJ has successfully pursued charges against former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, but it has refused to take action on charges recommended by the committee on other former Trump advisers, such as former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.
If the DOJ pursued a contempt of Congress charge against Trump, it could signal that the department is likely pursuing other criminal charges against the former president — including possible indictments relating to his involvement in the Capitol attack as well as his improper transfer of government documents (some of them highly classified) from the White House to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida following his departure from office.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $115,000 in one-time donations and to add 1365 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy