Legal experts say former President Donald Trump’s $500 million lawsuit accusing former attorney Michael Cohen of both revealing his confidences and “spreading falsehoods” about him “makes no sense.”
Trump on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against his former longtime fixer in federal court in Florida, days after the former president pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts of falsification of business records stemming from Cohen’s hush-money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 campaign. Cohen, who pleaded guilty to federal charges in connection to the payments and testified that Trump reimbursed him, is expected to be a key witness in the trial.
The lawsuit accused Cohen of breaching his contractual obligations to Trump and spreading false information in public statements, books and media appearances, according to CNN.
Cohen “chose to capitalize on his confidential relationship with (Trump) to pursue financial gain and repair a reputation shattered by his repeated misrepresentations and deceptive acts, fueled by his animus toward the Plaintiff and his family members,” the lawsuit claims.
Trump’s legal team claimed in the suit that the former president has “no alternative but to seek legal redress” to stop Cohen from making public statements.
“Mr. Trump is once again using and abusing the judicial system as a form of harassment and intimidation against Michael Cohen,” Cohen’s attorney Lanny Davis said in a statement to CNN. “Mr. Cohen will not be deterred and is confident that the suit will fail based on the facts and the law.”
Trump’s legal team previously worried that such a lawsuit could backfire, according to The New York Times. Trump previously withdrew a dubious lawsuit against New York Attorney General Letitia James and was fined nearly $1 million for filing a frivolous lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and other political enemies. The Times also added that the discovery process in the lawsuit could be potentially damaging to Trump as he faces multiple criminal investigations in New York, Georgia and D.C.
Cohen already threatened to counter-sue Trump on his podcast on Thursday.
“I can’t believe how stupid he was to have actually filed it. He should have listened to the lawyers that told him ‘it’s a mistake’. He’s now opened himself up to everything that he refuses,” Cohen said, according to The Independent.
“The documents are stupid. They don’t make any sense,” Cohen said. “He’s gonna get countersued, there’s no doubt about that one, for what he’s doing.”
Former Manhattan prosecutor Karen Friedman Agnifilo told CNN that Trump appeared to accidentally admit that at least some of Cohen’s claims are true in the lawsuit.
“It’s an interesting case here because, on the one hand, he’s saying everything is false, right?” she said. “So if he was breaching attorney-client privilege, you’re doing that by telling things that were said to you in confidence. But so, is he saying things that Michael Cohen is saying are true because I told him in confidence, and now he’s breached that privilege? Or is he saying that the things are false? Because if they’re false, why didn’t he bring a defamation claim? So it kind of makes no sense.”
Attorney Bradley Moss dismissed Trump’s complaint.
“This is a PR stunt, arguably one as retaliation because Michael Cohen is now the star witness in the Manhattan criminal case,” he told Axios.
“There may have been legitimate issues that Trump could have raised years ago,” Moss added. “He could have sued to stop publication of the book, all kinds of things, but at this stage, he can’t risk discovery on any of this stuff.”
Loyola Law Prof. Jessica Levinson called the lawsuit a “classic Trumpian move.”
“Trump uses lawsuits like stump speeches,” she explained in an MSNBC op-ed. “Despite his claims that others weaponize the legal system against him for political purposes, that is precisely what Trump has done, and appears to be doing here. Filing a lawsuit, even one that may later be tossed out as frivolous, allows Trump to claim that what Cohen allegedly did to him is so egregious that he had to resort to using the legal system.”
Levinson wrote that it was ironic that “it appears Trump is trying to hush up the person previously in charge of making his hush money payments,” adding that the lawsuit primarily shows “how nervous Trump is about the criminal case pending against him.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.