Two separate investigations are looking into whether Donald Trump may have engaged in tax fraud by overvaluing a little-known property owned by the former president and claiming a higher tax deduction on it than what he actually deserved.
Both Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. and New York Attorney General Letitia James are conducting investigations into the Trump property.
The 50,000-square-foot mansion in Westchester County, New York, built in 1919 by former Federal Reserve Chair Eugene Meyer (who also once owned The Washington Post), features 60 rooms, 15 bedrooms and three swimming pools on 230 acres surrounded by “nature preserves,” according to the Trump Organization website.
Trump bought the property in 1996, with the intention of developing it into something more than just a vacation retreat for himself and his family, including possibly turning it into a golf course or a high-end residential area. But resistance from several localities where the property sprawls across has stymied those efforts, resulting in the former president, prior to taking office, deciding to turn more than 150 acres of the property into an easement for a conservation land trust.
The move came with some financial benefit for Trump, as he received a $21 million tax deduction on the property based on a professional appraisal from December 2015 that valued Seven Springs being worth $56.5 million, The Associated Press reported. However, that appraisal value was much higher than the $20 million value of the property that local government assessors had suggested Seven Springs was worth that year.
The tax deduction Trump claimed from the easement would have been significantly reduced, had the lower-priced assessment had been used instead.
Vance’s and James’s investigations are looking into the property and the possibility that Trump may have benefited from overvaluing Seven Springs at a higher price when he used it as a write-off.
Vance, who is conducting a criminal inquiry into Trump regarding the possibility he engaged in tax, banking and insurance fraud, won an important legal battle last month after the Supreme Court refused to hear challenges from the former president’s lawyers to the Manhattan district attorney’s subpoena for Trump’s financial records. On the same day the high court announced it wouldn’t hear those challenges, Mazars USA, Trump’s accounting firm, handed tax and other financial documents over to Vance’s office.
Vance began the inquiry after revelations that Trump had allegedly made hush-money payments to adult film actor Stormy Daniels during the presidential campaign. The district attorney sough to determine whether such payments had violated state tax law.
The investigation expanded, however, particularly after Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen testified before Congress that the former president had often inflated and deflated his assets to manipulate his tax filings and loan applications.
“It was my experience that Mr. Trump inflated his total assets when it served his purposes and deflated his assets to reduce his real estate taxes,” Cohen said in February of 2019.
The lowest criminal offense related to tax fraud in the state of New York is a misdemeanor charge, and can be punishable by up to one year in prison if a person is found guilty.
It’s unclear what types of charges Vance may seek against Trump, if any, following the conclusion of his criminal inquiry. No former president in U.S. history has ever been charged with committing a crime, let alone found guilty of such charges.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.