President Donald Trump shared a tweet on Monday morning of a white St. Louis couple brandishing and pointing their guns in the direction of protesters against anti-Black racism and police violence who were marching toward the mayor’s office.
While it’s unclear what Trump intended by sharing the post, his past statements against demonstrators who are part of the Movement for Black Lives have prompted news agencies to suggest the president was likely retweeting the video in support of the display of weapons against protesters.
If that is indeed the case, the president could be endorsing an illegal action. According to Missouri state law, it is illegal to exhibit, “in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner.”
The 30-second video shows a white man holding an assault rifle and a white woman holding a handgun. Both appear to point their weapons at participants in a racial justice protest walking by their home, with video the tweet Trump shared (via ABC News) showing the man involved yelling at the demonstrators.
A couple pointed guns at protesters in St. Louis as a group marched toward the mayor's home to demand her resignation. https://t.co/5EqDd43QCd pic.twitter.com/KWNaif77ch
— ABC News (@ABC) June 29, 2020
According to witnesses present and other new reports, the couple featured in the video appear to be Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who together own a personal injury law firm in St. Louis. The two purchased and restored the home shown in the background of the video in 1988.
Protesters walking past the couple’s home on Sunday were en route to the office of St. Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson, who recently shared in a video message the names and addresses of individuals in the city who wrote to her urging for the defunding of the police department, a method of intimidation that is known as “doxxing.”
Krewson has since apologized for the action, but many are still calling for her resignation over the incident. A petition asking for her to step down has since received around 45,000 signatures.
Trump’s seeming endorsement of these two individuals’ actions is the second social media post in as many days the president has made in which he appeared to support violence against protesters. A video Trump tweeted out on Sunday showed one of his supporters yelling “white power” toward a demonstrator who was protesting against the president.
“Thank you to the great people of The Villages,” Trump wrote in his tweet accompanying the video, referencing the retirement community in Florida where the protest occurred.
Trump later deleted the tweet amid uproar from others on social media, including from members of his own party. White House spokesman Judd Deere explained that Trump hadn’t heard the statement in question, even though it happened toward the beginning of the video.
The administration wouldn’t comment on whether Trump condemned the statement from the man in the video, according to reporting from The Associated Press.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.