Republican nominee for president Donald Trump is deriding a new poll that shows him losing to Democratic nominee Kamala Harris in Iowa, falsely purporting that the survey is a form of “suppression” that is somehow criminal in nature.
The Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll, a well-regarded and typically accurate survey, released its final results ahead of the 2024 presidential election, finding that a plurality of voters in the state prefer Harris over Trump by a margin of three points.
Harris attained 47 percent support from likely voters in the poll, versus 44 percent who said they were going to vote for Trump. The three-point difference is within the poll’s margin of error, but J. Ann Selzer, who runs the survey on behalf of the Des Moines Register, said the results show that Harris is the clear leader in Iowa right now.
Much of her analysis indicated that Trump wasn’t losing support in the state so much as Harris was gaining support — similar to what was observed in the poll from September.
“Our analysis then was, it wasn’t that people were switching their allegiances [from the poll in June], it was that more people were qualifying as likely voters in September…. [who said] they will definitely vote” in this year’s race, Selzer explained, adding that there was a “bigger number of likely voters” in that poll, a trend that continued in the recently published survey.
The poll also showed that Democrats have the potential to flip two of the state’s four House seats, which are currently held by Republican representatives. If true, Iowa could potentially play a role in flipping overall control of the House to Democrats.
Trump was angered by the poll’s results, blasting them on his Truth Social site after they were published. He described Selzer as a “Trump hater who called it totally wrong the last time, have me up, BY A LOT.” During a rally over the weekend, Trump also suggested that she should face criminal repercussions for publishing the poll.
“It’s called suppression,” Trump falsely asserted, referring to The Des Moines Register poll. “They suppress, and it actually should be illegal.”
Beyond being wrong about the poll’s motivations (and his fascist demands for anyone who undermines his authority to be punished), Trump is also wrong about the poll’s accuracy. While every poll could potentially be an outlier, Selzer’s polling methods have been widely regarded, and the survey she conducted in the last presidential race was remarkably close.
According to an aggregate of polling data collected by RealClearPolling from 2020, pollsters predicted a 2-point advantage for Trump in Iowa against President Joe Biden. Selzer’s poll, however, predicted a 7-point win for Trump in the state. Trump went on to win Iowa by around 8 points.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy