Trump attorney Joe Tacopina sought to gain access to the jury room after the judge overseeing E. Jean Carroll’s civil rape and defamation trial against former President Donald Trump ruled that the jury would be anonymous over the risk of harassment and retaliation.
Tacopina on Friday spoke out against U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan’s decision to keep juror identities anonymous over concerns about the risk to their privacy and safety.
Kaplan last month “said the need for juror anonymity reflected the ‘unprecedented circumstances in which this trial will take place, including the extensive pretrial publicity and a very strong risk that jurors will fear harassment, unwanted invasions of their privacy, and retaliation,'” according to Reuters.
Tacopina previously sought the judge’s permission to access juror identities in a letter to Kaplan last week. “Team Trump is also asking Judge Kaplan to use a juror questionnaire and reconsider his ruling that not even the attorneys can know the names of potential jurors,” wrote MSNBC analyst Lisa Rubin.
On Monday, Tacopina sent another letter to Kaplan urging him to reconsider the ruling and pushing to be “involved at all stages of the jury selection process.”
“While [we] understand that the Court has discretion over how to conduct jury selection in a civil case, we submit that counsel should be involved at all stages of the jury selection process (even in the Jury Assembly Room),” the letter says. “We also submit that counsel should have input into the Court’s description of the case as well as into the questions asked of potential jurors in the Jury Assembly Room. Rule 47 makes it clear that the parties and their counsel have that right, and further, a more robust jury selection process in this case will serve the interests of justice. We would note that, in this regard, we already have submitted to the Court proposed voir dire questions to be asked, which have yet to be ruled upon. However, for present purposes we do wish to inquire further as to the Court’s planned process.”
Rubin called Tacopina the “Chumbawumba of New York lawyers,” in an apparent reference to the band’s song “Tubthumping.”
“He gets knocked down, and he gets up again,” she wrote in a Monday tweet. “He just filed a letter asking for clarification on the jury selection process in the Carroll trial — & insisting on his right to be in the rooms where it happens.”
Tacopina has seen a flurry of media attention in recent months related to Trump’s legal troubles. In a separate letter, he and fellow Trump attorney Alina Habba requested last week that Judge Kaplan delay the rape trial proceedings for four weeks, citing the “deluge of prejudicial media coverage concerning his unprecedented criminal indictment and arraignment in Manhattan.” Kaplan rejected the request on Monday, partly faulting Trump for the media frenzy around his arrest.
Last month, ahead of Trump’s formal charging of 34 felony counts related to the falsification of business records, Tacopina drew criticism when he lunged to snatch documents from MSNBC host Ari Melber during a heated interview.
Tacopina has also been at the center of reported infighting among Trump’s legal team, with other MAGA lawyers reportedly calling him “dumb,” “a loudmouth,” and “such a frickin’ idiot.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.