Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Ignored More Than a Dozen Early COVID Briefings — But Now Blames China

Trump, who doesn’t read his daily briefings, likely received oral warnings about coronavirus in mid- to late-January.

President Trump, seen through a window, watches a television in the press office as newscasters talk about him moments after he was speaking with members of the coronavirus task force during a briefing in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on April 22, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

President Donald Trump continues to place much of the blame for the presence of coronavirus in the United States on China, suggesting in comments on Monday that his administration was looking into Beijing’s actions to demonstrate that they are at fault for the pandemic’s spread.

“We’re doing very serious investigations…. We are not happy with China,” Trump said to reporters. “There are a lot of ways you can hold them accountable.”

The new strategy seems to be one that Republicans, in general, are signing onto, as a newly disclosed memo detailed how Senate Republicans are aiming to put most of the blame for the disease on China within their campaign strategy.

“Coronavirus was a Chinese hit-and-run followed by a cover-up that cost thousands of lives,” that memo said.

But the way Trump acted early on during the crisis puts contentions like these into doubt, as it was evident in public statements that the president was all-too-happy to accept China’s narrative on the disease while ignoring the warnings in the President’s Daily Brief (PDB) from intelligence officials not to do so.

On January 31, Trump ordered most travel from China to be suspended to stop the spread of COVID-19, though some exceptions were allowed. He has since claimed that the decision has “saved a lot of lives,” but experts say there’s no real way to tell if that’s true or not.

In the immediate weeks following that date, however, the president took a more congenial tone with China. On February 10, he said that the nation’s leaders were running things “professionally” and that they had the virus “under control.”

“I really believe they are going to have it under control fairly soon,” Trump added.

On February 13, after being questioned about it, Trump seemed to acknowledge that China’s messaging on coronavirus could probably not be trusted, but he also appeared to justify President Xi Jinping’s decision to be less forthcoming on what was happening on the ground.

“Well, you never know. I think they want to put the best face on it. So you know, I mean, if somebody — if you were running it, you’d probably — you wouldn’t want to run out to the world and go crazy and start saying whatever it is because you don’t want to create a panic,” Trump explained.

He elaborated that he continued to think “President Xi is extremely capable” in handling the matter.

Those words from Trump contradict what his intelligence team was trying to tell him at the time.

According to The Washington Post, Trump received more than a dozen PDB reports from officials in January and February demonstrating the seriousness of the pandemic in China, including its spread to other parts of the world. Since Trump reportedly doesn’t read the briefings himself (preferring to hear them orally from aides, if at all), the coronavirus issue was discussed out loud for his benefit in oral versions of the PDBs in mid- to late-January, according to at least one official.

Included in the PDBs was the fact that China couldn’t be trusted when it came to information the country’s leaders were trying to disseminate. Still, as noted above, Trump appeared willing to accept Beijing’s statements on occasion, or if he didn’t trust them, he didn’t seem to think that their misinformation about the spread of COVID-19 was anything to worry over.

Indeed, Trump spent most of February downplaying the seriousness of coronavirus, including on February 26 when he implied that the number of cases then seen in the U.S. would be “close to zero” within a matter of days.

When critics noted that his words contradicted what health experts were saying about the disease, the president scoffed at them, stating that those critics were engaged in a “new hoax” against him to make him look bad politically.

Trump claimed at that time that Democrats and the media were in “hysteria mode” about the possibility of the virus spreading more. Almost two months to the day since those comments, however, it seems those worries might have been justified, now that nearly 60,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 and over a million cases have been reported in the U.S. as of Tuesday morning.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy