Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Suggests Delay in 2020 Elections, Citing Inaccurate Claims on Voter Fraud

There is no evidence that mail-in voting leads to high rates of fraud, as the president has repeatedly asserted.

President Trump speaks as he departs the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 29, 2020, en route to Texas.

President Donald Trump floated the idea of delaying the 2020 elections on Thursday morning, as he invoked repeatedly disproven claims that mail-in voting is susceptible to voter fraud.

Trump did not say whether he would seek to postpone the elections, but rather suggested the idea to his Twitter followers.

“With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history,” Trump tweeted on Wednesday morning. “It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???”

The president’s tweet contained a number of inaccuracies. For example, his claim that absentee ballots have more protections against fraud than mail-in voting has been refuted by fact-checking organizations.

The chances of an illegal ballot being cast through the mail is so slim that individuals actually have a higher chance of being struck by lightning than becoming the victims of voter impersonation fraud. Indeed, only 31 ballots out of billions cast over a 15-year period were found to be fraudulent, according to an analysis from The Washington Post.

Others on social media noted that the president has no authority to change the date of elections. “There is no law or Constitutional provision that allows a president to ‘delay’ the election,” Mother Jones’s D.C. Bureau Chief David Corn wrote in a tweet.

“Trump CANNOT delay the election,” Vanita Gupta, president of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and a former director of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, chimed in. “Date of the general election is set by federal law, fixed since 1845. It would take a change in federal law — an act of Congress — to move that date.”

Journalist Sam Stein suggested that Trump might be attempting to distract voters from bad news about the economy this morning.

Trump’s suggestion of delaying the 2020 election comes soon after voting rights and legal experts raised alarms over the possibility that the president’s deployment of federal police into Democrat-led cities could be used to intimidate and suppress in-person voting.

Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian who is an expert on authoritarianism and fascism, said Trump’s tweet “is a fine example of his propaganda tactics: float the idea (trial balloon) and have it amplified by allies until it becomes something possible.”

The idea that Trump could try to delay or cancel the presidential election, in light of the increasing probability he could lose, has been raised in the past, including by his main opponent in the race, Democratic Party presumptive nominee Joe Biden.

“Mark my words: I think he is gonna try to kick back the election somehow, come up with some rationale why it can’t be held,” Biden predicted in April.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.