One of the pieces of evidence that Donald Trump unsuccessfully fought to keep out of the hands of the congressional committee investigating the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol shows that the former Republican president considered ordering soldiers to seize voting machines across the nation following his 2020 election loss, a document published Friday by Politico revealed.
The document — a draft executive order that Trump ultimately did not sign — “credulously cites conspiracy theories about election fraud in Georgia and Michigan, as well as debunked notions about Dominion voting machines,” explains Politico’s Betsy Woodruff Swan.
Woodruff Swan reports it is not clear who authored the draft order. However, its contents are consistent with proposals made by Sidney Powell, a former Trump attorney and purveyor of the “Big Lie” that the 2020 election was stolen.
“This draft order represents not only an abuse of emergency powers, but a total misunderstanding of them,” Liza Goitein, co-director of the Liberty & National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, told Politico. “The order doesn’t even make the basic finding of an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’ that would be necessary to trigger any action… It’s the legal equivalent of a kid scrawling on the wall with crayons.”
Wow after the election trump or his enablers drafted a executive order directing the Secretary of Defense to seize voting machines.https://t.co/LgBHmuzbBQ pic.twitter.com/RNhDAs6j9T
— Bill Pascrell, Jr. (@BillPascrell) January 21, 2022
Woodruff Swan writes:
The order empowers the defense secretary to “seize, collect, retain, and analyze all machines, equipment, electronically stored information, and material records required for retention under” a U.S. law that relates to the preservation of election records. It also cites a lawsuit filed in 2017 against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
Additionally, the draft order would have given the defense secretary 60 days to write an assessment of the 2020 election. That suggests it could have been a gambit to keep Trump in power until at least mid-February of 2021.
The government accountability watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) notes that the draft order “was part of the records that Trump was fighting to keep from the January 6th committee,” a reference to the bipartisan House select panel investigating the attack.
Ahead of the insurrection, there was a draft executive order that would have ordered the defense secretary to seize voting machines.
This was part of the records that Trump was fighting to keep from the January 6th committee. https://t.co/DEqft5RxZH
— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) January 21, 2022
Trump had sought to prevent the January 6 committee from obtaining more than 700 documents, which were held by the National Archives. However, the U.S. Supreme Court by a vote of 8-1 on Thursday sided with the committee, which wants to know what was happening in the Trump White House during the deadly assault on the Capitol by supporters of the defeated president as Congress was meeting to certify President Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory.
In response to the revelations Friday, U.S. Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) tweeted that “every single Trump seditionist must be prosecuted.”
In a Washington Post analysis of the draft order, national correspondent Philip Bump writes that “the main predicate President Donald Trump cited as his rationale for having federal officials seize every voting machine in the nation as part of his doomed effort to prove that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him was that Sheryl Guy had forgotten to update something on her computer.”
Guy, the clerk of Antrim County, Michigan, was alerted by staffers to an error that occurred when she added a candidate to the county ballot at the last minute on Election Day. During the process of adding the candidate for village trustee to the ballot, Guy failed to properly update the counting machines with new parameters. Slightly over 2,000 Trump votes were subsequently—and erroneously—shifted to Biden. While rushing to correct this mistake, employees double-counted some more votes.
Trump won Antrim County by nearly 3,800 votes. Biden won Michigan by more than 300,000 votes.
Analysis: Donald Trump’s rationale for seizing voting machines was worse than you might have assumed https://t.co/zXSCcTbb4Q
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) January 21, 2022
However, Bump writes:
A right-wing media ecosystem primed by Trump to look for evidence of ‘fraud’ decided that fraud was precisely what had happened in Antrim County. Despite the fact that the results didn’t effect the state outcome. Despite the fact that the error was explained. Despite the fact that it was a Republican county that Trump had won. Antrim County became a shorthand for ‘fraud committed via electronic voting machines.’
In June 2021 a Republican-run state legislative committee published a report on Michigan’s 2020 elections process. It found no evidence of wrongdoing. Addressing Antrim County in particular, the committee declared that “all compelling theories that sprang forth from the rumors surrounding Antrim County are diminished so significantly as for it to be a complete waste of time to consider them further.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.