On Monday, former President Donald Trump, now the presumptive candidate for the Republican Party’s nomination for president in the 2024 election, appeared to suggest he was open to the idea of “cutting” Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, a notion his aides quickly tried to dispel and that the Biden campaign attempted to capitalize on.
In an interview with CNBC host Joe Kernen, Trump was asked if he had changed his “outlook on how to handle entitlements,” specifically those three programs.
“There is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements — in terms of cutting — and in terms of also the theft and the bad management of entitlements,” Trump responded.
Republicans — and Trump himself — have raised the idea of “cutting” these programs before, but such proposals are wildly unpopular, as many Americans depend on social safety net programs for when they hit retirement age or for if/when they face financial difficulties.
President Joe Biden was quick to share the relevant clip of the interview on his social media page, with a caption that read, “Not on my watch.”
Shortly after, Trump’s campaign team tried to do damage control, with a spokesperson stating that the GOP candidate for president was “clearly talking about cutting waste, not entitlements” themselves.
Yet there are two problems with that presumption. First, the very fact that a statement to clarify Trump’s words was needed at all suggests that Trump’s words weren’t as “clear” as his campaign claims them to be. Second, Trump stated “in terms of cutting” the programs aside from dealing with “bad management” of them.
Trump has proposed cuts to these programs before, including in 2020 as president, when he aimed to reduce spending on Medicaid by $1.5 trillion, on Social Security by $25 billion and on Medicare by $845 billion. Within that proposal, Trump’s White House tried to justify the cuts by claiming they were mainly about wasteful spending — however, a report from Vox noted that the proposed cuts weren’t just for waste.
“When it comes to Trump’s proposed changes to Medicaid and Social Security, the intent is unambiguous: These are cuts to benefits,” that report stated at the time.
Indeed, Trump “included budget cuts to Social Security and Medicare every year of his presidency,” political commentator Dan Pfeiffer noted. “Monday’s comment was also not the first time that he expressed interest in cutting Social Security and Medicare.”
Polling demonstrates Americans want more, not less spending dedicated toward these programs. Indeed, a Data for Progress poll that preceded Biden’s State of the Union address this month found that expansions to these programs were popular.
Eighty-eight percent of voters backed expanding the Medicare provision enacted by Biden during his first term to allow the program to negotiate the cost of popular prescription drugs. On Social Security, 78 percent supported increasing taxes on billionaires in order to increase the number of benefits that program allotted, while 76 percent supported the idea of providing subsidized health insurance in states that haven’t yet expanded Medicaid coverage.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 253 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy