“Incarcerated women’s writing and publishing serve a dual purpose: to challenge existing misconceptions and correct stereotypes… and to boost self worth in a system designed to erase all traces of individuality.”—Victoria Law, Resistance Behind Bars
Tweeting as @xychelsea, her Twitter bio describes her as a “Former Intelligence Analyst. Trans Woman. Prisoner.”
Chelsea Manning became the most famous prisoner on social media after she was sentenced to 35 years in Leavenworth military prison for leaking some 750,000 classified documents. Manning tweets by proxy — meaning she relays her thoughts via voice phone to representatives who maintain her Twitter account from beyond prison walls. With regard to the Orlando nightclub murders, Manning recently messaged, “Please stop using our bodies, blood, and pain for politics and profit ='( #LGBTQ #pulseshooting”
Because of “security concerns,” just a handful of US institutions are experimenting with allowing prisoners limited access to the internet and social media. According to Howard University Researcher Tamanika Ferguson, author of the women’s studies project titled “Women in Prison Speak: Writings by Incarcerated Women and their Advocates,” most incarcerated writers turn to newsletters produced on the outside or academic journals to tell their stories.
Howard University Researcher Tamanika Ferguson lectures on prisoners and social media at the University of Southern California, June 24, 2016. (Photo: Robyn McGee)Ferguson’s inspiration for studying the ways women in prison communicate was born through her experience as a Black girl growing up in inner city Los Angeles, where she witnessed and experienced the impact drug dealing, gangs and incarceration had on her family and community. Ferguson said, “I saw my female family members being locked up and I understood at an early age the general perception that women in jail are bad people and should not be allowed to speak out about the circumstances that contribute to their confinement and how they are treated in jail.”
CeCe McDonald, a Black trans activist, was jailed in two men’s prisons for 19 months after being convicted of second-degree murder of a man who was attacking her. While she was incarcerated, the CeCe Support Committee created a blog and website to keep the public updated on her status, and regularly posted her writings. After her release, McDonald wrote the foreword to Captive Genders: Trans Embodiment and the Prison Industrial Complex edited by Eric A. Stanley and Nat Smith:
“I was a trans woman, surrounded by so many men … but they wanted to know who I was as a person,” McDonald wrote in her foreword. “This surprised me because the media portrays people in prison as angry, evil, and deceiving. For me it was the opposite — those behaviors came from the staff.”
As technology allows for more avenues for prisoners to communicate with the outside world, Ferguson’s research seeks to expand on Michelle Alexander’s groundbreaking book, The New Jim Crow, which addressed the consequences of mass imprisonment of Black men in the US. According to the International Centre for Prison Studies’ 2013 report, 201,200 women are incarcerated in the US — almost one-third of the world’s documented female prison population. Ferguson says, “Their voices and stories must be told and heard.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 5 days to add 340 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.