The Treasury Department is stonewalling inquiries seeking information about President Trump’s business ties abroad, according to the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee.
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) has for months been asking Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin if Trump Organization ties have been vetted by officials for compliance with a bevy of federal laws and regulations.
In a letter released to the public on Tuesday, the lawmaker said the Department isn’t answering these questions. Brown accused Mnuchin’s staff of having “altogether missed the point of my inquiry” with its latest “one-paragraph response,” pertaining simply to conflict of interest policy.
Brown has been asking Mnuchin since March for details about Trump’s partners and associates that “have been or would be vetted by Treasury for potential conflicts” with US laws on sanctions, terrorist financing, foreign corruption, money laundering, and the Bank Secrecy Act.
Brown has also been seeking information about Trump-related business partners that could be flagged for concerns by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).
The body is an obscure inter-agency organ, chaired by the Treasury Secretary. It was founded during the height of the Cold War to determine if foreign control of an American business impacted “the national security of the United States,” in the words of CFIUS.
Brown told Mnuchin to ask Trump to divulge associates that could bring up compliance concerns “[i]f you have not received such a list.”
The lawmaker said this should be done so that “appropriate officials within the US Intelligence Community may assess [associates] and alert [Trump] and members of his family” to past or future risks posed to the administration.
“I am sure that the President, his children, and the firms they now control would want to sever their ties with any such actors — or at least ensure going forward that compliance programs within the Trump Organization are sufficiently strong to enable them to identify any problematic business associates and respond accordingly,” Brown said.
The senator had last brought up these compliance issues with Mnuchin just two weeks ago, at a May 18 Senate Banking Committee hearing. Mnuchin told Brown to “just send me a note on what you are looking for.” Brown replied that he already had.
The lawmaker’s initial inquiry, dated March 2, noted that Trump, unlike his predecessors, “has elected to not divest himself of investments that pose potential conflicts of interest.”
According to Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, the Trump Organization isn’t complying with the Emoluments Clause — the part of the US Constitution forbidding the President from accepting gifts from foreign state actors.
The Trump Organization itself had claimed that it wasn’t practical “to identify individual travels who have not specifically identified themselves as being a representative of a foreign government entity on foreign government business.”
Cummings replied last week, saying that if the Trump organization was incapable of sniffing out possible Emoluments violations, then the President should “divest his ownership or submit a proposal to Congress to ask for our consent.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have until midnight tonight to add 132 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.