Democratic lawmakers in Congress are calling on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to end his years-long obstruction of a bill that would restore the Voting Rights Act, a push that those in favor of the bill say would honor the late Civil Rights icon Rep. John Lewis, who passed away on Friday at age 80.
Some also suggested that the bill be renamed after Lewis.
“John Lewis risked his life for the right to vote. Truly honoring his legacy means passing the Voting Rights Act,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) wrote on Twitter.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) also called for the bill to be allowed on the Senate floor.
“As author and chief sponsor of the Senate bill I will be reintroducing #VRAA this week, naming it for John Lewis, my longtime partner on this,” he tweeted out.
“To honor John Lewis’ life and legacy, I’m calling on Mitch McConnell to immediately bring the Voting Rights Advancement Act to the Senate floor for a vote and the Senate should name it the John Lewis Voting Rights Act of 2020,” Sen. Kamala Harris (D-California) said.
House Majority Whip Rep. John Clyburn (D-South Carolina) also called for the bill to be allowed on the floor for a vote. And speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union” program on Sunday, Clyburn voiced his support for the bill to be renamed in honor of his late colleague.
“It should be the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of 2020. That’s the way to do it,” he said. “Words may be powerful, but deeds are lasting.”
Lewis was among the leaders who led a march over the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, in 1965. The march was meant to draw attention to the need to protect voting rights of Black Americans. State troopers attacked demonstrators at the protest, with Lewis himself receiving a cracked skull from a trooper who hit him to the ground with a nightstick. The Civil Rights hero has returned to the site annually in remembrance of what happened there in 1965.
On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Clyburn also called for the bridge to be renamed in Lewis’s honor.
“Edmund Pettus was a grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. Take his name off that bridge and replace it with a good man, John Lewis, the personification of the goodness of America, rather than to honor someone who disrespected individual freedoms,” Clyburn said.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a law intended to block state efforts at implementing discriminatory voting practices that limited the rights of Black voters to take part in democratic elections. Federal officials were also dispatched to states where intimidation or other attempts to limit voting were the norm.
In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that key aspects of the act were not needed any longer. Critics of that ruling noted, however, that successes observed by the conservative justices were happening precisely because the law was working.
Tossing those aspects of the law aside when they had worked as they were intended to was “like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet,” dissenting Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted.
Since the law was blocked, efforts in Congress to restore the Voting Rights Act have stalled, with McConnell being one of the main obstacles to its passage. In 2019, after the Democratic-led House passed a bill that would restore the act, McConnell refused to even allow the bill to reach the Senate floor, saying at the time that he gets “to decide what we vote on.”
“What is the problem we’re trying to solve here? People are flooding to the polls,” he added, defending his decision to block its passage.
Yet, there are a number of examples where the bill could have worked to stop discriminatory actions in voting, including possibly preventing the closing of polling places in precincts where a majority of voters are Black, and restricting racist gerrymandered maps or voter ID laws that have been passed by state governments since the Supreme Court’s decision was rendered.
In 2013, Lewis himself opined on the Court’s decision to gut the law. “Those justices were never beaten or jailed for trying to register to vote,” he wrote. “They have no friends who gave their lives for the right to vote. I want to say to them, ‘Come and walk in my shoes.'”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.