Washington — On a sunny, cloudless day, thousands of protesters encircled the White House Sunday in a show of numbers intended to persuade President Barack Obama to stop a proposed oil pipeline from being built.
The Keystone XL pipeline would stretch 1,661 miles from Alberta, Canada, to Texas' Gulf Coast and requires a presidential permit because it crosses the U.S.-Canada border. Environmentalists say the project is a key test of Obama's green credentials.
Wearing orange vests with the message “Stop the pipeline #noXL,” protesters first heard from prominent environmentalists, a preacher, a Nobel laureate, and a movie star, and then gathered to hold hands in a ring that stretched in front of the White House and several blocks down side streets before joining up behind the White House lawn. Organizers estimated that the crowd exceeded 10,000 people.
“You can't occupy the White House, but you can surround it,” said environmentalist and protest organizer Bill McKibben in a reference to the Occupy Wall Street movements spreading around the country.
With the failure of climate change legislation on Capitol Hill last year, environmentalists have made stopping the Keystone pipeline their major focus in recent months. They want the president to reject the pipeline because of the risks of spills and what they say is the likely impact on global warming from tapping Canada's vast oil sands. The thick crude from the oil sands produces more heat-trapping carbon-dioxide emissions than regular oil because of the extra energy required to extract and process it.
“That is the second biggest pool of carbon on the planet. If the U.S. government goes ahead and makes it easier to develop that oil-sands project, then there is no credible way to insist that they're working hard on climate change,” McKibben said.
Many people waved blue signs quoting Obama's own words from 2007: “Let's be the generation that finally frees America from the tyranny of oil.”
Leah Delaney, a junior and environmental studies major at the University of Vermont, was one of many college students who traveled to Washington for the protest.
“We're part of the generation that's in charge of the future and as a 20 year-old student, I can't imagine being part of the generation that lets the earth down,” she said.
Obama wasn't at the White House during most of the protest. He spent much of Sunday golfing in Virginia on a crisp sunny day. He said early last week that he will wait for a State Department report that is expected by the end of the year before making a decision.
“My general attitude is, what is best for the American people? What's best for our economy both short term and long term? But also, what's best for the health of the American people?” Obama told a Nebraska television station in an interview. The pipeline would cross through Nebraska.
Mike Doody, 44, took a bus to Washington with several fellow environmentalists from Rochester, N.Y.
“I'm against the continuation of fossil fuel extraction. It's a losing end game to continue something that we all know is killing the planet and is ultimately going to run out,” he said.
Protests often attract celebrities looking to voice their opinions on various pet issues, and Sunday was no different, with actor Mark Ruffalo addressing the crowd.
“(The protest) makes me proud to be an American, and it just gives me a lot of heart. We've been fighting for these things for a while and I think people are really starting to wake-up now, so it's very heartening,” he said in a short interview with McClatchy.
The demonstrators said their protest, one year to the day before next year's election, was a warning to Obama: if he allows the pipeline to move forward, a significant portion of his base will be less inclined to work hard for his re-election campaign.
“Young people still believe in Barack Obama, but we know that he's going to need a little bit of a push from us to make the right decision and fulfill some of those campaign promises that he made in 2008,” said Maura Cowley, the co-director of the Energy Action Coalition, a coalition of 50 youth-led environmentalist and social justice groups.
A two-week anti-pipeline sit-in outside the White House in August resulted in 1,524 arrests, but there were no arrests Sunday.
TransCanada Corp., the company that wants to build the pipeline, has argued that its construction has economic and energy-security benefits. A study written for the company said that 20,000 construction and manufacturing jobs would be created for two years.
Terry Cunha, a TransCanada spokesman, said Americans need to decide where they want to get their oil from and argued that the Keystone XL pipeline would add a new reliable energy source for the U.S.
“Do they want it to come from Canada where we share similar political beliefs and environmental guidelines or do they want to import it from the Middle East or Libya where they do not share the same political beliefs as we do here in North America?” he asked rhetorically.
Jim Hansen, a crusading NASA climate scientist, said if the pipeline is approved, the consequences for the climate could be dire.
“It's still possible to stabilize the climate during the rest of this century if we don't develop unconventional fossil fuels. But if we develop the tar sands and tar-shale, then it's game over.”
(Lippman is a McClatchy special correspondent.)
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.