Until recently, Jonathon Murray relied on Medicaid to pay for treatments for multiple health conditions, including chronic insomnia. Murray, a 20-year-old restaurant worker from the college town of Brookings, South Dakota, said that without his medication, he would stay awake for several nights in a row.
“I’d probably not be able to work that much because I’d be tired but couldn’t fall asleep,” he said.
Murray’s mother is paying $1,548 more than usual in health insurance premiums over three months to make sure he can afford his sleeping pills, other medication, lab work, and doctors’ appointments.
Murray had to scramble to find an insurance option after he was surprised to lose his Medicaid coverage on April 1 — even though he will likely requalify July 1.
Due to a convoluted situation in South Dakota and North Carolina, Murray isn’t the only person who will experience this whiplash in Medicaid coverage.
Medicaid is the joint federal and state health insurance program for people with low incomes or disabilities. During the national covid-19 public health emergency, states were barred from removing people from the program even if they no longer qualified.
This rule has now ended, and states can redetermine whether Medicaid participants still qualify. The federal government estimates 15 million Americans will lose coverage under Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program because they no longer qualify or because of paperwork issues.
But as South Dakota and North Carolina remove participants from Medicaid, the states also plan to add people to the program. That’s because South Dakota voters and North Carolina lawmakers recently approved Medicaid expansion, which will increase the number of people eligible for the program.
“It would have been great if they would have kept people on until the expansion, so you’re not kicking so many people off,” said Kathy Murray, Jonathon’s mother.
South Dakota could have tried to prevent participants from temporarily losing Medicaid coverage, according to several health policy experts.
State officials are “saying federal regulations mean that they have to kick people off before expansion, and that’s just not right,” said Joan Alker, executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. “They absolutely could be structuring this in a way that those people didn’t experience a loss in coverage.”
Lucy Dagneau, head of Medicaid campaigns for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, agreed. South Dakota and North Carolina “can’t actually stop the process of the unwinding. However, they have flexibility in terms of how they batch the enrollees,” she said.
Alker and Dagneau said states don’t have to start the unwinding process right away, and when they do, they could delay reviewing enrollees who are likely to requalify under expansion.
South Dakotans and North Carolinians who want to avoid a gap in health care coverage can apply for private insurance, which could be subsidized under the Affordable Care Act. They could then reapply for Medicaid once applications for expansion coverage begin. But if they wind up uninsured during the gap period, they might avoid seeking treatment or face expensive bills.
South Dakota is one of five states that began culling April 1, the earliest date possible. Its Medicaid expansion goes into effect July 1. About 16,000 South Dakotans were disenrolled in April, but more than 1,700 of them will requalify under expansion, according to state data.
North Carolina will begin disenrolling people who are no longer eligible for Medicaid on July 1. The state has not set a timeline for Medicaid expansion, but it’s expected to occur within the unwinding period, which lasts through May 2024.
Jay Ludlam, deputy secretary of North Carolina’s Medicaid program, said the uncertain timing makes it difficult to avoid temporarily disenrolling people. Ludlam said about 300,000 North Carolinians are expected to be removed from Medicaid during the unwinding. He estimated one-third of them will requalify after expansion.
Kathy Murray added Jonathon to her workplace insurance plan, which will more than double her premiums over the intervening months. She said she won’t be able to pay some other bills during this time, but her son can’t go without health care.
She said South Dakota’s approach seems inefficient, since state workers will have to disenroll and reenroll some people within a short period. “It’s creating a lot of work for the state workers because they’re going to send out paperwork and requalify everybody,” she said.
Matt Althoff, secretary of the South Dakota Department of Social Services, said that the agency’s unwinding plan is “based on compliance with CMS rules, limitations of the technology used to support South Dakota Medicaid, and the overall impact to customers.”
The agency wrote in a March document that it was working closely with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services “to explore waivers and flexibilities during the period of the unwinding prior to expansion and will continue to do so.”
Althoff did not respond when asked by KFF Health News whether the state had discussions with the federal agency about avoiding temporary disenrollments. Sara Lonardo, press secretary for CMS, said the agency could not comment on whether it had any related conversations with South Dakota or North Carolina officials.
Although South Dakota won’t prevent people likely to requalify for Medicaid from temporarily losing coverage, it is taking steps to make sure they know to reapply.
The state is screening people who no longer qualify for Medicaid under the current rules to see if they would requalify after Medicaid expansion. If so, they should be sent letters encouraging them to reapply.
Since 2014, the Affordable Care Act has allowed states to offer Medicaid coverage to more people, with the federal government paying 90% of the costs. All but 10 states have opted into Medicaid expansion.
South Dakota adults currently qualify for Medicaid if they have a certified disability or have children and incomes up to 46% of the federal poverty level. That translates to $13,800 for a family of four.
Jonathon Murray qualified for Medicaid as a child. But he became an adult during the public health emergency and thus no longer qualifies.
Medicaid expansion will allow adults, with or without children, to enroll in the program if they earn up to 138% of the federal poverty level, or $20,120 for a single adult. Murray’s income as a part-time restaurant cook and dishwasher should allow him to requalify and begin receiving Medicaid coverage on July 1.
Get Covered South Dakota helps people understand and apply for health care insurance. So far, everyone the organization has assisted after being disenrolled from Medicaid has qualified for subsidized private plans under the Affordable Care Act’s marketplace, according to program manager Penny Kelley. For people with low incomes, the subsidies can cover most or all of their premiums.
South Dakota Voices for Peace, a nonprofit agency, is assisting people with the Medicaid unwinding and expansion process. Carla Graciano, its outreach coordinator, said many people are confused about the unwinding process after not having to worry about health coverage for more than three years during the public health emergency.
“We have heard concerns about people potentially losing their medical coverage,” Graciano said. “It puts a lot of people under stress.”
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.