Some say a diplomatic agreement between Obama and Putin is the only way a USA ‘intervention’ in Syria can be permanently avoided. Should talks between the two countries go sour, recent coverage of the Russian treatment of Queers could help provide the public support Obama needs to defame Russia and justify a preemptive strike that doesn’t have Russian approval. Publishing negative press about Russia, at this point in time, should be taken seriously, as it may have the unintended consequence of drumming up public frustration about Russia at a time when diplomacy is needed.
Our press has done a great job covering the implications and injustices of an oppressive Russian law that shockingly bans the promotion of Queer relationships and rights in front of Russian children. But why, during such a fragile moment in USA-Russia relations are we choosing, among all the unjust laws on Earth, to focus on Russia’s most recent, inexcusable, anti-Queer one?
I understand: if you want to sell newspapers, publishing stories about anti-Queer laws would be a wise choice. People in the USA support same-sex marriage; our Supreme Court recently ruled marriage between people of the same sex is constitutional. We are proud of this accomplishment, and will buy newspapers about how (way) ahead of others we are on the issue.
The practicality of our passion for Russia’s anti-Queer law however is questionable. In her recent Washington Post column, Katrina vanden Heuvel explained how the attention we give Russian internal policy could in fact empower Putin (and Russia’s unjust laws). If the USA speaks out against a Russian law, the Moscow Kremlin can use this publicity as leverage to gather support for the law within Russia, where the USA remains unpopular. Our outspoken opinions about Russia’s most recent draconian law empowers the Kremlin, as vanden Heuvel quotes Russian scholar Dave Zirin, to “portray himself as the defender of the traditional Russian family [from Western culture], Orthodox Christian values and national pride all at once.”
So, if we really cared about our Queer allies in Russia, we’d stay out of it. And if we want the American public to encourage Obama to be diplomatic with Putin and stay out of Syria, we might think twice about pointing out Russia’s flaws at this moment in time.
Our most important fundraising appeal of the year
December is the most critical time of year for Truthout, because our nonprofit news is funded almost entirely by individual donations from readers like you. So before you navigate away, we ask that you take just a second to support Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.
This year is a little different. We are up against a far-reaching, wide-scale attack on press freedom coming from the Trump administration. 2025 was a year of frightening censorship, news industry corporate consolidation, and worsening financial conditions for progressive nonprofits across the board.
We can only resist Trump’s agenda by cultivating a strong base of support. The right-wing mediasphere is funded comfortably by billionaire owners and venture capitalist philanthropists. At Truthout, we have you.
We’ve set an ambitious target for our year-end campaign — a goal of $180,000 to keep up our fight against authoritarianism in 2026. Please take a meaningful action in this fight: make a one-time or monthly donation to Truthout before December 31. If you have the means, please dig deep.