Skip to content Skip to footer
|

The Nominees to the National Labor Relations Board Deserve Confirmation: As I See It

It is almost impossible to understand why a small agency like the National Labor Relations Board would be the object of attacks.

When we’re in elementary, junior high, and high school, we are taught about democracy, but once we are at recess or going to and from school, democracy is out the window, and the bullies can rule.

These days, it seems that the Republican Senate and House caucuses are filled with people who paid no attention to learning how democracies work.

Instead, they use the bully lessons they learned in the schoolyard. Their motto seems to be taken from wrestlerGorgeous George (nee George Wagner), who said, “Win if you can. Lose if you must. But always cheat.”

Perhaps that is the strategy. It is too late to make President Obama a one-term president, so the goal now is to shut down a democratically elected government with the hope that years of intransigence will get them victory in 2014 and 2016.

But bullying as a political strategy has serious consequences for the people they are supposed to represent. Senate Republicans have blocked President Barack Obama’s nominees to the National Labor Relations Board for years now – functionally shutting it down.

It is almost impossible to understand why a small agency like the National Labor Relations Board would be the object of attacks.

There is no valid reason to block President Obama’s nominees, all of whom would bring deep and varied backgrounds to the job.

Most people have never heard of it, but the board plays a vital role in protecting employees’ rights in the workplace. For example, many employers have rules that forbid their employees from discussing their pay with one another. However, an employer that forbids employees from talking about their pay or fires them if they discuss their pay has committed violations of the National Labor Relations Act.

This may seem to be a trivial issue, but if employees cannot discuss their pay and other workplace conditions, they are at a bargaining disadvantage compared to their employer who has that information.

Some people claim that the NLRB is a shill for unions, but this is simply untrue. Before taking any action, the NLRB investigates alleged violations, and, if a violation is found, prosecutes the case, at no cost to the employee.

The National Labor Relations Act includes union violations. Again, if an NLRB investigation shows that a union has violated the National Labor Relations Act, the NLRB will prosecute the union.

And when appointments are made to the NLRB, the long standing tradition is to balance the NLRB members with 3 of the 5 members being from the President’s party and 2 from the minority.

In fact, President Obama has followed that tradition. The President nominated five well-qualified Board members: three Democrats and two Republicans. Senate Republicans responded by blocking a vote on them.

There is no valid reason to block President Obama’s nominees, all of whom would bring deep and varied backgrounds to the job – if only the Republicans stopped being bullies and played by the Senate’s longstanding rules.

Mark Gaston Pearce, nominated to be the board’s chairman, has years of experience in industrial relations. After law school, he was a trial specialist with the NLRB for 15 years. In addition, he was a member of the New York Industrial Board of Appeals (IBA), practiced as a union-side attorney, and taught labor law at Cornell University. Most recently, he served the NLRB as Board Chairman since 2011.

The other two nominees, Harry I. Johnson, III and Philip A. Miscimarra are both Republicans who represented corporations.

The two board members – Sharon Block and Richard Griffin – are serving recess appointments. Most of member Block’s career has been in government, ten years of which were working for the NLRB, including working for former Republican board chairman Battista. Griffin worked for the International Union of Operating Engineers and for the Board.

However, it is a mistake to treat NLRB decision-making as a team sport in which everyone chooses sides or to assume that a Board member’s practice experience predicts how that member will vote in every case.

When the board functions properly, it is a slice of democracy, in which people discuss their understandings and conclusions with one another and try to live up to their oath to faithfully discharge the duties of their office.

These nominees all deserve to be confirmed, and the American people deserve a functioning National Labor Relations Board. It’s time for the Republicans to stop the bullying and give us back a functioning democracy.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy