Skip to content Skip to footer

The Lessons of “Snowmageddon“

When “snowmageddon” buried the nation’s capital in February, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Ok) cheered on his grandchildren in building an igloo on the Capitol grounds, and couldn’t have been prouder of them in mocking Al Gore. But Sen. Inhofe is jeopardizing his grandchildren’s future. By every scientific measure, greenhouse gases are heating the Earth rapidly and forcing us all to participate in a game of climate Russian roulette. In fact, Russia is one of this year’s biggest losers.

When “snowmageddon” buried the nation’s capital in February, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Ok) cheered on his grandchildren in building an igloo on the Capitol grounds, and couldn’t have been prouder of them in mocking Al Gore. But Sen. Inhofe is jeopardizing his grandchildren’s future.

By every scientific measure, greenhouse gases are heating the Earth rapidly and forcing us all to participate in a game of climate Russian roulette. In fact, Russia is one of this year’s biggest losers.

Temperatures 25 degrees hotter than normal, causing apocalyptic wildfires, have turned central and western Russia, including Moscow, into a ghoulish hell to rival J.R.R. Tolkien’s Mordor. Death rates are double the norm from the heat and smoke, and thousands have already died.

20 million Pakistanis are now homeless because of flooding from monsoon rains. Flooding in China has killed thousands. Desperation, starvation and diseases like cholera are inevitable. Crops in Russia, China, Pakistan and many other countries have been devastated, causing suspension of grain exports and price spikes. Millions who struggle to feed themselves in a normal climate will be unable to afford enough food to survive.

Climate disasters are mounting in on virtually every continent. Record-breaking heat in our East and South, unprecedented flooding in Tennessee and Iowa, and a chronic, deepening drought in the Western U.S. have given us just a taste of the misery other countries are now enduring.

This summer’s events fit exactly the scientists’ projections of more frequent and more intense extreme weather events due to global warming. Notwithstanding the Kool Aid being broadcast at Fox News, even “snowmageddon” fits into the models of a human-caused climate crisis.

Last year, the lead article in the Lancet, one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals, written by 29 distinguished medical scientists, called the climate consequences of the greenhouse gas phenomenon, “The biggest global health threat of the 21st century,” and will “put the lives and well being of billions of people at increased risk.”

The report goes on to state that, “Even the most conservative estimates are profoundly disturbing and demand action. Less conservative climate scenarios are so catastrophic that adaptation might be unachievable.” The authors said, “What is needed now is a public health movement that frames the threat of the climate crisis for humankind as a health issue.”

Many of the same politicians who supported preemptive war in Iraq don’t believe in preemptive rescue of their fellow men from climate disaster. Then-Vice President Dick Cheney said if there was a one in 100 chance Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, the invasion was worth it. So far, we’ve spent $2 trillion on that 1 in 100 chance. Those same people seem to be unwilling to spend a fraction of that addressing what our best scientists say is a 98 in 100 chance that CO2 is turning the climate into a global weapon of mass destruction.

A skeptical but still qualified and honest investigation of climate science could lead one to challenge the scientific community’s consensus on the odds of imminent disaster, but not defiantly dismiss it as an impossibility or a hoax. The “see no warming, hear no warming, speak no warming” posture can only come from ideological rigor mortis or ulterior motives.

With every passing day, the deniers seem more and more absurdly detached from climate science, wallowing instead in climate witchcraft. Taunting them now might bring some satisfaction, were it not for the fact that through their obstructionism, they have grabbed the steering wheel of this country’s energy policy, which is rapidly becoming a ship not just of fools, but a ship of the selfish and cruel.

It’s one thing to turn your back on the suffering of the masses halfway across the world and rationalize that it is not your problem. But to listen to the scientists’ warnings of the risk we are subjecting our own children and grandchildren to, and proudly dismiss even the possibility, is criminal neglect of future generations.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy