Dylan Matthews, a reporter at The Washington Post, recently wrote an interesting article suggesting that Stan Fischer, who announced last month that he was resigning as governor of the Bank of Israel, might become the next chairman of the Federal Reserve.
Mr. Fischer would indeed be highly qualified (as would Janet Yellen, the vice chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, or Christy Romer, the former chairwoman of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, to name two other obvious candidates). But Mr. Matthews also suggested that Mr. Fischer might have an advantage in the confirmation process because he has been a highly successful governor of the Bank of Israel, and he worked well with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
I think this is fantasizing; Mr. Matthews is failing to face up to the deep monetary craziness of the modern Republican Party. You have to bear in mind that the party’s intellectual leaders are people who have spent the past four years expecting hyperinflation any day now. Two years ago they lectured Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman, on how terrible it is to “debase” currency. And, of course, the utter failure of their predictions hasn’t changed their minds a bit.
So here comes Mr. Fischer, who said in the Washington Post article: “I still think Keynesian economics is extremely important, and if anybody didn’t think so, this crisis should have made them rethink.” This is actually a double insult to the Ryanoids — both praise for Keynes and the suggestion that one should rethink one’s views in the face of experience, which are both anathema to them. And as head of the Bank of Israel, his signature achievement was a large debasement — sorry, depreciation — of the currency, which insulated the nation from the crisis and was achieved through huge purchases of foreign exchange.
This is actually a form of quantitative easing (as well as a bit of currency war); it’s exactly the kind of thing the G.O.P. goes wild about when Mr. Bernanke does it. But doesn’t Mr. Fischer’s success play a role? Hey, that’s evidence-based thinking, which is part of what the Ryanoids are fighting.
I guess my point is that President Obama should appoint someone good — Stan, Janet, Christy, or someone else to be named — and not even try to appease the crazies.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $100,000 in one-time donations and to add 1300 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy